[JPG]

How did that turn the other cheek and not fight back work out for George W. Bush? Sarah Palin was accused of being complicit in murder and you're darn right she had a right to fight back. In fact, not only a right but a DUTY.

FNC will rue the day they ditched the ones that 'brung 'em' to the dance.

[Still Thinking]

How did that turn the other cheek and not fight back work out for George W. Bush?

Exactly. Then he even went beyond not fighting back to acting like libs were good guys and cooperated in their statist schemes. That got him good press for two or three hours till the Bushitler drone resumed from the MSM and the very guys he dirtied himself by cooperating with, and we get stuck with the programs forever! No Child's Behind Left Alone, for example. Not a good trade.

[lentulusgracchus]

How did that turn the other cheek and not fight back work out for George W. Bush?

Exactly. The Clintons never did that -- just the opposite. Not that I'm a Clinton fan, far from it. But they had an iron rule, that they didn't let a political charge overhang the day's news cycle without a reply of some kind (for them, usually lies and misdirection).

Hell, the Clintons beat getting caught in a sex scandal, treason, perjury, subornation (the commodities thing), Arkancide, and actual impeachment.

So as between Slick and Poppy, who was the more robust politician? The one who answered charges, or the one who shut up and tried to walk past them?