Skip to comments.
AT-6 Seen As Versatile Combat Aircraft
Aviation Week and Space Technology ^
| May 18, 2011
| David Fulghum
Posted on 05/18/2011 8:09:29 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Artwork: Hawker Beechcraft
To: sukhoi-30mki
Naaa, this is the way to turn a trainer into a CAS aircraft.
(It's a T-28D for you young whipper-snappers. That's a B-17 engine hanging off the front.)
2
posted on
05/18/2011 8:22:24 PM PDT
by
BwanaNdege
("Experience is the best teacher, but if you can accept it 2nd hand, the tuition is less." M Rosen)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Looks like a WW2 bird (even leaving out the nose art).
I suppose looks are deceiving....
3
posted on
05/18/2011 8:23:36 PM PDT
by
ExGeeEye
(Freedom is saying "No!" to the Feds, and getting away with it. "Speak 'NO' to Power!")
To: sukhoi-30mki
AC-208B... Look that stealthy STOL single turbo high wing Cessna up on Google. Deploys small squads for tactical insertion missions. HALO. Loitering command center & weapons platform on station for 6 hours or more. Hellfire and guns as required. Short field landing and retrieval. Stealthy ride home. Uses convenient and appropriate markings.
Air medals, valor and Purple Hearts; in appreciation for those who do God's work.
4
posted on
05/18/2011 8:31:19 PM PDT
by
Broker
(Mabuhay!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Hey, let's see a real photograph. Whoops, there isn't one. Our warriors are being denied use of the Embraer Super-T that they needed yesterday, so Beechcraft can get the AT-6 ready for tomorrow.
5
posted on
05/18/2011 8:31:56 PM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: BwanaNdege
T-28A/B/C Engine Pratt & Whitney R-1820. Not familiar with Ds. Great plane to fly, fully acrobatic and forgiving. Go Navy!
6
posted on
05/18/2011 8:34:45 PM PDT
by
Broker
(Mabuhay!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Sort of a Spitfire/Mustang look to it. Funny how we’re going back to a platform that’s 70 years old.
It’ll be hard to beat the A-10’s cost and firepower.
7
posted on
05/18/2011 8:38:38 PM PDT
by
lurk
To: ExGeeEye
The original AT-6 Texan was a WWII era trainer. This bird is apparently too tough to die.
To: Broker
The “D” had added hardpoints for ordnance plus an ejection seat (Martin-Baker, IIRC)
Yeah, the T-28 was a kick to fly! When did you go through Pensacola?
As to the “forgiving”, it was kinda interesting in spin recovery. Put in the corrections and it would go another 3/4 turn, pause briefly, then snap into the opposite rotation if you didn’t center the rudder pedals ASAP.
Fun bird to fly, though. GOBS of torque!
9
posted on
05/18/2011 8:56:41 PM PDT
by
BwanaNdege
("Experience is the best teacher, but if you can accept it 2nd hand, the tuition is less." M Rosen)
To: Broker
Cessna Caravan!
Thanks, that’s a new adaptation to me. Super reliable aircraft.
10
posted on
05/18/2011 9:00:32 PM PDT
by
BwanaNdege
("Experience is the best teacher, but if you can accept it 2nd hand, the tuition is less." M Rosen)
To: hinckley buzzard
The original AT-6 Texan was a WWII era trainer. This bird is apparently too tough to die. Somebody in our neighborhood has an original AT-6. They bring it out on weekends to practice aerobatics over the golf course.
The sound of that P&W Wasp engine is unmistakable -- an intrusive, whining buzz.
11
posted on
05/18/2011 9:01:28 PM PDT
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
To: BwanaNdege
Correct me if I’m wrong, but they built that plane to accommodate that engine, no?
Kind of like building the Wart Hog around that enormous gatling gun....
12
posted on
05/18/2011 9:04:36 PM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(If Obama is the answer, how stupid was the question??)
To: hinckley buzzard
That explains a great deal.
For a second there I thought I was looking at a P-51.
13
posted on
05/18/2011 9:06:02 PM PDT
by
ExGeeEye
(Freedom is saying "No!" to the Feds, and getting away with it. "Speak 'NO' to Power!")
To: sukhoi-30mki
The only low tech plane for me...
To: sukhoi-30mki
Wondering why it has to be a two seater? A-10 pilots fly their missions alone.
To: Bean Counter
I believe the idea behind the T-28 was to give student pilots experience in high torque aircraft prior to jumping into a monster like the AD-1 Skyraider with the R-3350-26W 2,800 hp engine.
All of the student pilots I knew were unable to hold the brakes on the T-28 during their first engine run-up. It would either creep forward, or they’d let one brake slip and it would pivot around the other gear.
I had a buddy trying to learn a maneuver called “Approach Turn Stall Recovery”. The correct proceedure was to lower the nose, level the wings and give it 36” MAP (power). He kept getting it wrong, got frustrated and slammed the throttle to the stop, 48” MAP.
The resultant 1425 hp, or thereabouts, torque-rolled the aircraft 720 degrees, two complete rolls before he could catch it.
Awesome beast!
I talked to the private owner of a T-28 at Sun-n-Fun one year who had previously owned a P-51. I asked him how the T-28 compared and he said that it was very similar in power to an early P-51A.
16
posted on
05/18/2011 9:32:11 PM PDT
by
BwanaNdege
("Experience is the best teacher, but if you can accept it 2nd hand, the tuition is less." M Rosen)
To: USNBandit
17
posted on
05/18/2011 9:32:23 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.' - Homer Simpson)
To: hinckley buzzard
Got a teeny bit of stick time on one a few weeks ago.
18
posted on
05/18/2011 9:33:56 PM PDT
by
Erasmus
(I love "The Raven," but then what do I know? I'm just a poetaster.)
To: Jeff Chandler
Looks like a painted up T-6 to me, without any of the stuff to accomplish the mission. A center pylon isn't going to cut it.
I'm just frustrated because I know some of the guys that worked on the Tucano project and then got the rug pulled out from under them by the Kansas congressional delegation right before they were going to deploy.
19
posted on
05/18/2011 9:38:50 PM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: Bean Counter
Speaking of the A-10 Warthog and the GAU-8 cannon, here is Burt Rutan's version he tried to sell to DOD. He "borrowed" a GAU-12 for testing. The GAU-8 was 7 barrels, 30mm while the GAU-12 was 5 barrels, 25mm.
The engine intake is on the opposite side of the fuselage from the gun muzzle. Otherwise the engine would flame out from the muzzle blast and gasses.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaled_Composites_ARES
20
posted on
05/18/2011 9:43:00 PM PDT
by
BwanaNdege
("Experience is the best teacher, but if you can accept it 2nd hand, the tuition is less." M Rosen)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson