‘U.S. Attorney Wifredo A. Ferrer said in a statement. “Instead, as today’s charges show, he acted with others to support terrorists to further acts of murder, kidnapping and maiming.” ‘
This ticks me off. If I was a judge and this case was brought before me, before the trial began, I would direct the prosecutor to write a 5,000 word essay on why prosecutors should not, in public, attempt to convict someone charged with a crime before a trial, and why they should not attempt to prejudice a jury prior to a trial.
The essay would be in longhand, in the prosecutor’s own handwriting.
And if the prosecutor ever, EVER, pulled another stunt like that, I wouldn’t care if he was prosecuting John Wilkes Booth, I would dismiss the case.
“And if the prosecutor ever, EVER, pulled another stunt like that, I wouldn’t care if he was prosecuting John Wilkes Booth, I would dismiss the case.”
Sanction the shark, yes. But, when you want to see a case of treason and aiding the enemy be dismissed on anything other than the facts - NO!
Perhaps more sleep might improve your perspective.
Your above quoted line seems to indicate you are less concerned with the facts of a case of known violent enemies of America than you are with possible prosecutorial misconduct.
As Islam is antithetical to, and irreconcilable with, America and the Constitution, any and all a Moslims in America are thus walking, talking, treason.
Islam Delenda Est.