Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslims for Burqa Bans
Islamist Watch ^ | 5/13/11 | David J. Rusin

Posted on 05/14/2011 1:14:46 PM PDT by ahungrywriter

As Islamists condemn the French ban on face-covering attire in public, it is worth noting that some of the strongest words in support of the law — and in opposition to the burqa and niqab — actually have come from Western Muslims. A few recent highlights:

(Excerpt) Read more at islamist-watch.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: burqa; islam; muslim; niqab

1 posted on 05/14/2011 1:14:50 PM PDT by ahungrywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ahungrywriter

All Allah’s children just want to be free.


2 posted on 05/14/2011 1:17:01 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: ahungrywriter

How about just banning Muslims, period?


4 posted on 05/14/2011 2:24:01 PM PDT by jmacusa (Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa; All

Never gonna happen here.. You know why... There is a thing called the 1st Amendment..


5 posted on 05/14/2011 5:03:56 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401----000-.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

That protects religion. Islam isn’t a religion.


6 posted on 05/14/2011 5:06:37 PM PDT by jmacusa (Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ahungrywriter

It gets almost no press, but there is a significant “protestant” Muslim movement, that is seeking to reform and modernize Islamic practices.

They are approaching it in two ways. First is to attack non-Islamic cultural practices that are not specified in the Koran, but this must be done through the “Tafsir”, a huge body of commentary and explication of what the Koranic verses mean, to back them up.

But there are also lots of twists and turns. For example, there are some statements that Mohammed made in the early days that he later contradicted. This is explained in the Tafsir as “nasikh”, which means it superseded the earlier statements, so though they are still in the Koran, they are null and void.

And the reformists want to take advantage of this, especially where Islamists use the former verses to justify their actions.

The other technique of the reformists is re-emphasis. Instead of emphasizing violence, terrorism and death; they put the Koranic emphasis on Mohammed’s statements about peace, prosperity and kindness.

Back in the days of the schism of Christianity between Catholicism and Protestantism, both sides pretended favoritism of God, and were murderous over truly unimportant details. Eventually this was overcome by emphasizing those elements of Christianity seen today, while de-emphasizing those that had been used to justify war and murder.

But this takes a long time. Hopefully, Muslims around the world will eventually see the value in peaceful coexistence, embracing this “reformed” Islam as a better way of life.


7 posted on 05/14/2011 5:06:43 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa; All

Well according the to US Government it is.. So it is not going to happen.


8 posted on 05/14/2011 6:15:59 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401----000-.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Never gonna happen here.. You know why... There is a thing called the 1st Amendment..

Unless we get a handle on our muslim problem it's going to have to happen.

After a half dozen bombings or so, something is going to give.

One only has to look at how quickly they got a big presence in Detroit to see that it isn't far off either.

9 posted on 05/14/2011 6:31:14 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Trump - noun, means fearless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Don’t be so sure. Never say never, right?


10 posted on 05/14/2011 6:40:41 PM PDT by jmacusa (Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa; Balding_Eagle; All
You dorks realize that if it does happen (when hell freezes over) it is going to be in tied up in courts.

Besides banning one religion in this country is bad idea. What next? Should we outlaw the LDS?? Should we outlaw Scientology?? Should we outlaw any other non mainstream religion?
11 posted on 05/14/2011 7:11:25 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401----000-.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

My point is that once it’s found out that burka clad muslims are the ones bombing our subways, trains and planes, all helll is going to break loose.


12 posted on 05/14/2011 7:24:33 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Trump - noun, means fearless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Watch who you’re calling a dork you gobshite*. The prevailing opinion here is Islam is not a ‘’religion’’ and there is more than enough documentation everywhere to prove just what Islam really is. You want to peddle the ‘’tolerance’’ crap take it elsewhere, it’s not welcomed here. >> * ‘’gobshite’’ is Irish for ‘’sh!tmouth’’ or one who speaks the same, get it?


13 posted on 05/14/2011 7:27:13 PM PDT by jmacusa (Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa; All

There is one thing that I peddle... The Constitution is a suicide pact. I’m not a fan of Islam, but a ban is never going to happen, so you might as well live in the real world.


14 posted on 05/15/2011 6:21:00 AM PDT by KevinDavis (The Constitution is a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

No, the Constitution isn’t a ‘’suicide pact’’. Not by a long shot. And I am living the real world, every damn day dude, every damn day.


15 posted on 05/15/2011 8:04:08 AM PDT by jmacusa (Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson