Posted on 05/11/2011 5:19:28 AM PDT by Kaslin
I take it you also believe, as a minarchist, that homosexuals should be allowed to "marry" each other and serve in the military and you also believe that a woman should be able to "choose" to murder her children?
McCain was not my first choice either. I didn't vote in the primary because by the time Texans got to vote McCain was the nominee, chosen by crossover democrats and the MSM.
I considered voting for hillary in the dem primary but decided there wasn't enough soap to make me feel clean afterwards.
Neither did the Founders.
What pagans do that does not harm me does not concern me.
What they do DOES harm you. Being in denial doesn't mean their affect doesn't exist. It simply means you don't want to do anything about it. Nice witness for Him. NOT!
Obeying God is my concern not the States concern.
Not the point. And God doesn't support anarchy but libertarians do.
And you didn't answer what I asked.
tell me drugs should be legal.
Square social liberalism with Christ, our Constitution and our nations Christian roots. And don’t forget homosexuality.
LOL - FReepers are a “fearful bunch?”
is that what they’re spouting over at Daily KOS these days?
Well, Paulbots are an entertaining bunch.
Agreed. I’m done for now.
It only makes sense to a moonbat.
Because nobody is buying your dreck. Conservatives and FR will not join you in your delusion.
I think she likes military people but doesn’t like their stuff like guns and tanks and bombs and stuff...... ya know?
snort****** :D
*resnort* giggle ROFL!
LOL!!!
If you understood the Constitution you wouldn’t be asking such stupid questions.
The States role is to protect me from harm by a neighbor. That’s it.
So because you fail to begin with the foundational thesis you instead assume the State has certain authoritarian rights to impose rules on peoples private behavior. Completely anti-constitutional.
So to answer your stupid questions from a Constitutional perspective:
a) Marriage is a religious affair. According to the Constitution people have a right to free association. That you wish to encroach on this right is telling.
b) The State has a right to prohibit homosexuals in the military if they feel that it would harm their duties to protect American citizens. Their obligation is to make sure they protect American citizens from harm in the best way possible.
c) The State has an obligation to protect babies as well as mothers. No, mothers cannot kill their babies.
You may score a double ZOT on this thread.
You think it has something to do with achieving some level of moral behavior. You believe Christianity is a cultural affair.
I believe Christianity has to do with individuals. I believe Christianity is about a person's trust in Christ.
It's not the States responsibility to force people to trust Christ.
You're the one advocating anarchism.
The States role is to protect me from harm by a neighbor. That’s it.
I'm not sure what state you are referring to, but that's NOT what the Constitution says.
So because you fail to begin with the foundational thesis you instead assume the State has certain authoritarian rights to impose rules on peoples private behavior. Completely anti-constitutional.
Again, not according to the Constitution of the United States of America.
a) Marriage is a religious affair. According to the Constitution people have a right to free association. That you wish to encroach on this right is telling.
Our Constitution is based in English Common Law and they have been regulating marriage for nearly a thousand years.
But, I'll take that as you supporting homosexual "marriage."
b) The State has a right to prohibit homosexuals in the military if they feel that it would harm their duties to protect American citizens. Their obligation is to make sure they protect American citizens from harm in the best way possible.
So, if the powers that be at any given moment decide it's not harmful to have sodomites in the military you don't have a problem with it?
c) The State has an obligation to protect babies as well as mothers. No, mothers cannot kill their babies.
Your only correct answer on this thread.
Those are all very nice assertions but do you have any actual evidence to back them up?
Where did I say it was?
Is it a Christians duty to stand by and allow society to go to hell in a handbasket?
Look up Banns of Marriage, the English started requiring them in the early 13th century.
DJ believes that Christianity is about achieving a certain level of moral behavior.
DJ believes that the State should enforce what DJ believes are the moral behaviors that are Christian.
Therefore the State should force people to be Christian.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.