The fundamental question isn’t whether same-sex couples should be allowed to call themselves “married”, but rather whether other people should be compelled to acknowledge them as such. I wish those who want to protect the institution of marriage would point that out. The “gay rights” advocates aren’t seeking to expand the rights so much as they’re seeking to restrict the right of other people to decide what unions they will choose to acknowledge.
This exactly the real issue. Should the People be deprived of there ‘Right to Representation’ on an issue of how sexuality is dealt with publically?
It is the left-wing that is anti-civil rights on this issue. They want to dictate their perverted morality to the people and deprive them of the right to disagreea at all even.
The left-wing not onloy want to deprive the People the Right to Representation on this issue but also want to criminalize all disgreement at all.
Companies are to be punished if they disagree under left-wing rule. Citizens are as well to be punished, fired, sued, etc.... if they simply do not agree.
The left-wing perversion rights movement is the most dictatorial oppressive movement that I have ever seen. They want to own your children even and continually march their perverted fascism into public schools.
The left-wing seek to PERVERT our Rights. The battle against same-sex perversion is a battle for freedom against the fascist left-wing.
The point of government recognized and rewarded marriage is to encourage continuation of the population, and to encourage both natural parents to raise their offspring.
Where the concept of natural procreation is ludicrous, the notion of marriage is ludicrous.
Jeff Davis is a moron. Poorly written, poorly argued (i.e., that sodomites cannot reproduce when they’re allowed to adopt children left and right). Stop using words like “interestingly” to try to make an argument.