Posted on 05/07/2011 6:48:49 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
Edited on 05/07/2011 7:05:48 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
The tornado that tore through here late last month left 41 dead and 12 still missing. Whole neighborhoods now resemble bombed-out postwar Tokyo or Berlin. But this devastation is only part of the story. Tuscaloosa is now the scene of an inspiring volunteer relief effort taking place without the guidance of any central planner.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Nothing like a bit of liberal snark in the morning.
There is no doubt that there are enough libs at Clear Channel to drown us in snarkiness, but this article was praising the relief efforts by part of their staff.
I looked at the article as proof that even libs will praise altruism - even it it is against everything that they believe in.
Why do you think it was meant as a “snark?” Did you bother to read the article?
Why do you think the article was written by “a lib.” A “lib” who quotes Hayek favorably?
Yes, I read the article.
Why is right wing talk radio characterized as an “unlikely” source of help?
If you see that at as an attack on talk radio, you are bit too sensitive. When one thinks of talk radio, philanthropy is not the first word that comes to mind. That’s not what they do. C’mon. Did you bother to read the article. It is a practically love letter to Clear Channel and Hayek.
I don’t think the article was an attack on talk radio.
The author asserts that it is unlikely that conservative talkers would help out. Right wing radio helping out. Who knew?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.