Well, I suppose there will be disagreements. I’ve seen those comments you speak of. But I find it impossible to believe. Yes, layering might occur in a .jpg file.
But at least one kind of layering consists of a black and white copy with all the boxes and printing superimposed on a color copy of the paper used to print out COLBs.
How do you explain that? Those theories you mention simply don’t fly. To begin with, it’s as if a completely transparent sheet of paper, rolled at the edge as if taken from a bound volume, was laid on top of the colored official background paper.
Yes, it’s possible that that might have been the case while the Hawaiian clerks were making the COLB. But the White House says it has the COLB. That’s a piece of paper. So, how come it has that very strange combination still? You DON’T get it if you copy the COLB, even if you might get it while constructing it.
Then there are further complications. Not just two layers, one color and one black and white, but numerous layers pieced together.
I think the very least we need to demand is that document experts be allowed to examine this COLB. The paper COLB which Obama now claims to have.
It’s not just a forgery, it’s an obvious forgery—whether or not a real document exists anywhere.
Fair enough. Still, one of the explanations I’ve read, stated that it must have been idiots who did the scanning of the doc, and frankly, most of us, and I venture to say, most of political science graduate interns who would be assigned to perform such work for the WH, belong to the category, when it comes to using complex software programs, that few ever manage, or have to master. So, yes, this remains an open issue. But let us hurry up, anyway.