Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/26/2011 12:11:07 AM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RobinMasters
This guy is turning into the perennial candidate. He is like Harold Stassen without the class. What a Truther dope.


2 posted on 04/26/2011 12:18:05 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Anyone who thinks that we are the “cause” of Islamic violence is flat out wrong. However, as someone who did 3 tours in Iraq, I have no love for the foreign policy of the last decade. Even when we have done the right thing, we have done it the wrong way. There is some hope that things will turn around in the Middle East, but there is also the very real possibility that every one of the failing dictatorships currently under duress will fall to religious extremists. I don’t think that is a net positive for my future grandchildren.


3 posted on 04/26/2011 12:20:10 AM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

is the sexy female in skimpy clothing responsible for the rapist raping her? Ron Paul says yes


4 posted on 04/26/2011 12:21:05 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
Ron Paul is himself and extremist too bad he cant see it

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

5 posted on 04/26/2011 12:27:15 AM PDT by expatguy (Support "An American Expat in Southeast Asia" - DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Someone tell the CIA they’ve been agreeing with Ron Paul about blowback, quick.


6 posted on 04/26/2011 12:32:05 AM PDT by OldNewYork (social justice isn't justice; it's just socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Didn’t Ron Paul name his kid “Rand” after Ayn Rand? Is this the position Randists take with respect to Islamic extremism? That it’s America’s fault?


7 posted on 04/26/2011 12:34:39 AM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Evolution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

What were the chances that Ron Paul was going to become less crazy?


16 posted on 04/26/2011 1:38:11 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (If you are 22+ years old and hate the police, there is something wrong with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Ron Paul is a nut!


18 posted on 04/26/2011 3:20:18 AM PDT by Jmouse007 (Lord deliver us from evil and from those perpetuating it, in Jesus name, amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
Oh’ Noes......the attack of the Paulbots

Endless drivel on trutherism, whack conspiracies, gold standard soapboxes

Here's the winning GOP ticket Trump/Paul < / S >

19 posted on 04/26/2011 4:15:23 AM PDT by Popman (Obama. First Marxist to turn a five year Marxist plan into a 4 year administration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
The finest people support him.


20 posted on 04/26/2011 4:31:04 AM PDT by Diogenesis ( Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

It is interesting that Ron Paul bases his entire philosophy on the global Islamic insurgency on the opinions of Michael Sheuer. Michael Sheuer epitomizes all that is wrong with America’s bureaucratized counterterrorism apparatus. First of all, he broke longstanding CIA regulations at the encouragement of his politicized superiors to write a book while in active service. This alone makes him a scumbag in my book. Thousands of honorable CIA operators could have done the same, but none did. There is a reason. It’s called honor. Second, Sheuer had a uniquely disturbing career in the CIA. A career analyst with no field experience, he was somehow allowed to become a case officer and eventually found himself in charge of the CIA unit tasked with killing or capturing Bin Laden. He failed miserably. Moreover, if you actually read his work, it is readily apparent that Sheuer has at best a superficial level of knowledge of Islamic threat doctrine. He is appallingly ignorant for someone who was in the position he was in. This has resulted in his belief that we are only being attacked because of things we have done and especially for our support for Israel.

I ask the members of Free Republic:

Is Jemmaah Islamiya attempting to establish an Islamic state in Indonesia because the US supports Israel?

Are the Chechyan jihadists waging Jihad against Russia because the US supports Israel?

Is Abu Sayyef attempting to establish an Islamic state on Mindanao because the US supports Israel?

Are Jihadists attempting to establish an Islamic state in southern Thailand because the US supports Israel?

Have Nigerian Jihadists attacked innocent Christians repeatedly because the US supports Israel?

Is Al Shabaad conducting terrorist attacks in Kenya and Somalia on innocent civilians because the US supports Israel?

Are Jihadists attempting to create an Islamic state in India’s Kashmir because the US supports Israel?

Have Jihadists killed thousands in attacks on innocent civilians in Morocco, Algeria, Argentina, Brazil, the UK, Spain, Jordan and Bangladesh because the US supports Israel?

Are young Jihadis rioting in France because the US supports Israel?

Why is all this happening? Could it be that there is something more to this global violence than the simple “blame America first” concept that Ron Paul supposes?

Why hasn’t he bothered to learn about the enemy threat doctrine?
Have you?


21 posted on 04/26/2011 4:35:08 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
Why is it that threads about Ron Paul must use lies? He did NOT blame the US for Islamic Extremism--he acknowledged that it exists on its own.

He also points out that our military in Saudi Arabia was used by Al Qaeda as a recruitment tool (something everyone acknowledges, and why we left). He also points out that we shouldn't be spending our money sending troops all over while we're in economic trouble (remember, Osama bin Laden pointed out that his strategy was to make the US spend lots of money, and it's well known that he wanted to bog us down in warfare that would drive up the price of oil--and it looks like we're helping his plan). He also spoke against supporting Obama going into Libya.

Why is it that threads about Ron Paul must use lies? I guess it's because the truth supports him.

22 posted on 04/26/2011 4:35:30 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Michael Scheuer is a craven dhimmi but I’ve never seen Jew-hatred from him. RAther he fears Islamic radicalism so much that he blames everything including Israel for it. He ignores Al Qaedas calls about liberating Al Andalus (Spain) and other parts of Europe once under the Muslim boot.


27 posted on 04/26/2011 10:27:35 AM PDT by rmlew (No Blood for Sarkozy's re-election and Union for the Mediterranean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson