If you propose to do something legally about the purported fact that Obama's father was a British national and hence making Obama ineligible under the Constitution to be President because he is not a "natural born citizen" under the definition in the Constitution, then you need the long form of the birth certificate to support that argument, which has never been tested in the courts.
The idea that the long form of the birth certificate is irrelevant to the issue described above is patently false. It is absolutely essential to press the case, if anyone has the standing to do so. As of now, no one is stepping forward.
I didn't propose doing anything legally about "the purported fact that Obama's father was a British national and hence making Obama ineligible under the Constitution to be President because he is not a "natural born citizen" under the definition in the Constitution" and I never said the LFBC was irrelevant.
Next two straw men?