Maybe someone can enlighten me, but I just heard her explanation and is she saying it is better that there is NO gatekeeper than to have the Secretary of State validate candidates? I thought that was part of the job description. According to the courts, citizens have no standing to question the eligibility- now she doesn’t want the SOS to have the right either...I am confused.
It doesn’t make sense. And particularly because this bill created FOUR gates as opposed to the one (SOS) right now. This bill creates the gate of the SOS, any person who wishes to challenge the SOS’s decision, state court, and the Supreme Court.
So because she thinks we shouldn’t have just one gatekeeper she vetoed the bill that would have created FOUR gatekeepers and leaves it so that there is..... one gatekeeper, who cannot be held accountable.
Her reason makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Either she is BSing big-time, playing CYA for her own self or Obama, or else she is just plain morbidly stupid.
“I am confused.”
You are not confused. This is Jan Brewer’s imitation of the “it’s all been twittered” judge.
It’s gobbly-gook. It’s legally non-nonsensical. It just serves to protect Obama, herself (as former SOS in 2008), and to make sure citizens never have standing to challenge Obama on eligiblity.
She was very good in helping get the Voter ID (when voting) passed. This is a mystery.
I’m wondering if Barry’s BC isn’t a double edged sword, but some of the Pubbies can’t figure out which end is sharper.
Perhaps Barry was born in HI, but with a different daddy, an American citizen daddy. Barry could whip it out, BUT, his fairytale of Barack Obama Jr. is out the window and his LIES ever more so exposed.
What is it that he has on the Clintons that they can’t make a “public move” on Barry’s fake life?