Obama, having been born in Hawaii under US jurisdicition, is manifestly eligible for the office he occupies, to which he was elected in a legal, free and fair election. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are the conspirator. You have no certified evidence that Obama was born in the U.S., is a natural born citizen, or even a citizen. None!
Fact: The only evidence available to you are Internet images of dubious origin, highly massaged statements from Fukino that resolve nothing, and hearsay from Lingle and Abercrombie.
Fact: It is irrational for anyone to spend tax dollars and personal money to hide common documents.
Fact: It is rational therefore for those defending Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution to be suspicious and have doubts concerning Obama’s natural born status.
Fact: It is rational to request certifiable evidence that Obama is a natural born citizen.
Finally: This is not about getting rid of Obama. If he is a natural born citizen he has every constitutional right to occupy the White House. Personally, I would not support any effort to impeach him.
No, that's not a fact. There is nothing dubious about the images, and statements from Fukino were explicit, not massaged, clearly stating, in no uncertain terms, that Obama was born in Hawaii. In addition to that, we have the corroborating and verifiable evidence of the birth announcements.
Fact: It is irrational for anyone to spend tax dollars and personal money to hide common documents.
Ture, but it's also a fact that Obama hasn't spent money to hide documents.
Fact: It is rational therefore for those defending Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution to be suspicious and have doubts concerning Obama’s natural born status.
No it's not, considering all the evidence pointing to birth in Hawaii.
Fact: It is rational to request certifiable evidence that Obama is a natural born citizen.
We have photographs of such certifiable evidence. Short of mailing a personal copy of the document to you, how else would you have him present the evidence?