Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Thinks Cutting $38 Billion Is “Living Within Our Means”
Gateway Pundit ,Rightnetwork ^ | April 9,2011 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 04/09/2011 12:53:55 PM PDT by Hojczyk

Obama talked again about “living within our means” in his Weekly Address today.

Beginning to live within our means is the only way to protect the investments that will help America compete for new jobs – investments in our kids’ education and student loans; in clean energy and life-saving medical research.

Of Course, Obama was bragging about the fact that he agreed to cut $38.5 billion from the federal budget this year. This is after Obama, Pelosi, Reid and Democrats added over a trillion dollars to the annual federal budget in the last 4 years.

That’s at least a 30% increase in federal spending in just 3 years. Is that “living withing our means?”

The Obama-Pelosi national deficit is over a trillion dollars for the third year in a row. Another Obama record.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: budget; budgetdeal; obama; shutdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2011 12:53:56 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

nobamna and his minions have already stolen enough money from our children and their children that they will be lucky to be anything but serfs. They hate you and your family.


2 posted on 04/09/2011 12:58:23 PM PDT by hal ogen (1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
That's according to the non-euclidean universe he and his liberal buddies live in.

And these idiots call the free market, "voodoo economics." I don't think these guys would recognize a supply-demand curve if they crashed into it.

3 posted on 04/09/2011 12:58:52 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

It is obvious the guy wasn’t a math major. Guess that is why he went into Political Science.


4 posted on 04/09/2011 12:59:26 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Well maybe we can win in Wisconsin..If I could only sell my house in Florida and move to Montana...No free-republic no internet ..No Fox News..just bears and Moose Drool BEER...DAM..Anybody in Montana want to trade houses..Venice Florida is not to bad..
5 posted on 04/09/2011 1:00:03 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

You only need to cut $1.6 trillion more, Obama.


6 posted on 04/09/2011 1:00:53 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Not only is he a usurper but a stupid one at that!! Soros needs to update those cd’s he plugs into barrys “scars” and at least attempt to make him look a little smarter!


7 posted on 04/09/2011 1:01:15 PM PDT by NoGrayZone (“Too often, Republicans have the fighting instinct of sheep"...RUN SARAH RUN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Photobucket
8 posted on 04/09/2011 1:01:48 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

$39 billion is far less than 1% (actually 0.28%) of the national debt, and only about 1% of the current year federal spending. It’s like a person who is $15,000 in debt boasting that he has cut his annual spending by $42. The general public probably has no clue about the insignificance and inadequacy of the $39 billion in cuts. Nor is it likely that they will be “real” cuts.


9 posted on 04/09/2011 1:02:55 PM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

You expect Obama to tell the truth as he continues to loot the taxpayers for his own special interests?


10 posted on 04/09/2011 1:03:49 PM PDT by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

You only need to cut $1.6 trillion more, Obama


Yep exactly. 1.6 trillion means that more or less the USA spends 10% more money than it has EVERY YEAR.
This means every baby born in the US right now is born with a debt of about $ 46.000.
A baby born next year has a debt of 50.600 dollars (just for beeing bor in this country) and on and on.


11 posted on 04/09/2011 1:17:22 PM PDT by darkside321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

NO. Headline should be he thinks a 2 trillion dollar deficit is.


12 posted on 04/09/2011 1:19:45 PM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkside321
This means every baby born in the US right now is born with a debt of about $ 46.000. A baby born next year has a debt of 50.600 dollars (just for being born in this country) and on and on.

This could be a great opportunity for Obozo to further push his abortion agenda! Much in the same spirit of telling people who criticize gas prices to "trade in your car", he can tell prospective mothers to "just abort your babies" to save them from the crush of future debt.

13 posted on 04/09/2011 1:24:27 PM PDT by Zman516 (muslims, marxists, communists ---> satan's useful idiot corps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

He can’t believe what he has said. Anyone who thinks adding a trillion or more, and cutting 38 billion is a big cut and living within our means has lost touch with reality. Either that or he has evil intent for our country, and since the former is not likely I am starting to believe more the latter.


14 posted on 04/09/2011 1:24:39 PM PDT by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Of Course, Obama was bragging about the fact that he agreed to cut $38.5 billion from the federal budget this year. This is after Obama, Pelosi, Reid and Democrats added over a trillion dollars to the annual federal budget in the last 4 years.

They "cut" $38.5 billion from the proposed budget. They however increased the budget by ~$100 billion from last years stimulus soaked budget.

There was no cut in spending -- there was an increase in spending.

15 posted on 04/09/2011 1:33:12 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zman516

This could be a great opportunity for Obozo to further push his abortion agenda! Much in the same spirit of telling people who criticize gas prices to “trade in your car”, he can tell prospective mothers to “just abort your babies” to save them from the crush of future debt.


There is even a bigger treath (luck for politicians that most people are not aware of it).
The reall pain starts when the US is no longer able to pay the interesst rates (Countries usually only pay the interesst rates every year).
But the time will come when the interesst rates get this high that the US will no longer be able to pay it because of the growing deficit. And then NO ONE will “borrow” you just a single cent!
In real live this means that the US will find itself in a position (Because the USA DEFINITELY WILL NOT pay back the debt!) where you have a 1,6 trillion deficit and NO one will lend you the money to solve it any longer.
In other words this means that the US (the people who are working) will have to pay all the money just to keep the US alive.
This means sooner or later a future president will tell you:
My fellow americans the good news is that you will still have your work. The Bad news is that we have to confiscate 20% of your money (because “only” half of the total population in the US has a job) just to keep the US alieve.
So now think about your paycheck and then delete some extra 20% of it every month!


16 posted on 04/09/2011 1:43:53 PM PDT by darkside321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud
It’s like a person who is $15,000 in debt boasting that he has cut his annual spending by $42.

It's not even that.

It's like a person who is $15,000 in debt, who plans to go an additonal $1,000 in debt and then only goes an additional $500 in debt.

17 posted on 04/09/2011 2:03:55 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zman516

Here’s an idea. Let’s start charging illegals that amount or double that amount for each anchor they drop in this country. Let them pay up front for their kid’s “citizenship”. Otherwise pack them back to their POS countries along with the anchors so we aren’t separating parents from spawn.

FUBO & FAD


18 posted on 04/09/2011 2:46:00 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Dragged kicking and screaming to live within our means and even that conclusion is a bald faced lie.


19 posted on 04/09/2011 2:55:26 PM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkside321

Actually we sell mostly short term debt and pay it off with even more short term debt. Rates are microscopic these days for short paper so its really not that horrible from a refinancing perspective.
The real problem is selling 100 billion in 3 month notes and selling 120 billion to replace that with. That 20 billion is all spending. When rates go higher they probably gap higher because we (our nation) will sell more longer term debt in anticipation of even higher rates. That increased demand will be welcome at first but afterward’s push rates up sharply. A nation buying our long dated treasuries will be able to sell them in the market of course but those transactions themselves can affect value. Buying paper over and over for say China is easy for them The horizon is right there,no losses to take ever. Own 30 year paper and you have a totally different investment.


20 posted on 04/09/2011 3:03:04 PM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson