Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: matt04

Good grief! Has this author ever heard of an “Act of God”?

They suffered an earthquake larger than I’ve ever heard of (and I’m a native of CA). Then they were nearly washed off the island by a Tsunami that crippled the eractor. THen they were beseiged by aftershocks greater than any CA earthquake in my memory. Who can plan against those forces of nature?

The big mistake, as I see it, is that they should not have tried to save these units. Fill them with cement and seal them.


7 posted on 04/08/2011 4:43:33 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: afraidfortherepublic
Fill them with cement and seal them.

Can't do that. The fuel MUST be cooled continuously. The fuel is buried inside the containment and the vessel. You can't get directly to it.

Chernobyl was and different design and was laid bare. You could get close to the fuel with cover and they installed engineered cooling as they buried it in the sarcophagus. That cannot be done here.

So in one ironic way, Chernobyl benefited with less designed safety (poor containment structures and a core that was combustible). The disaster was worse as a result, but it made the containment after simpler to install.

27 posted on 04/08/2011 5:13:12 PM PDT by SteamShovel (The RADIATION PIMPS...are RATS in compassionate clothes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson