I am against our Libyan combat policy, but I think Steyn is barking up the wrong tree when he demands a specific mission. Would he feel better if he was told that we’re doing it because Gadaffi has weapons of mass destruction?
I think it should be enough for Steyn to point out that we’re broke and can’t afford any additional crazy, wasteful wars.
He is one of the most prolific actual writers (and entertaining at that) of the conservative movement.