Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

...And last but NOT least, DID the two Honolulu newspapers PRINT 16,500 BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENTS IN 1961?....

Methinks not, and this point needs to be researched and go viral.


140 posted on 04/05/2011 9:49:50 PM PDT by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone

thanks...because IF we go by the VITAL STATS RECORD LIST being the basis of birth announcements in Hawaii in 1961, as told to ‘Lori Starfelt’ by the HDOH on the telephone, a MYTH she then perpetuated by posting on the teaxasdarlin blog...

then we have to assume that the parents had NO choice in the matter of the placement of announcements...and we have to assume that ALL of the 16,500 children born in Hawaii in 1961 DESERVED to have their births announced! And those who didn’t deserve an announcement had to be ‘weeded out’ by some process.

How was that done, on what basis?

Now imagine YOU wanted to place a birth announcement in either or both of the Honolulu newspapers in 1961. Pretend you are Dr Nordyke. You go to the newspaper office, ask for a form to complete for an announcement...and THEY tell you, ‘IT’S ALREADY BEEN ANNOUNCED FROM THE VITAL STAT RECORD’

AND IT DOESN’T APPEAR FOR ELEVEN DAYS!


142 posted on 04/05/2011 10:11:04 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson