Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Future jobs won’t support decent living standard: Report (Walmart Greeters)
Yahoo ^ | 4/1/11 | Yahoo

Posted on 04/01/2011 3:53:36 PM PDT by mewykwistmas

"The result? To achieve economic security, a single parent with two children needs an income of just over $30,000 a year--nearly twice the federal minimum wage--while a two-income household needs almost $68,000.

The study then finds that, according to Labor Department projections, fewer than 13 percent of jobs to be created by 2018 will meet the economic security threshold for a single parent with two kids. Forty-three percent of those jobs will meet the threshold for a two-income household.

In other words, most of the jobs of the future aren't likely to pay enough to offer the kind of stable, middle-class existence that for much of the 20th century was seen as the American birthright.

"The American Dream of working hard to support your family is being re-written by the growth of low-paying industries and rising expenses," said Joan Kuriansky, WOW's executive director."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0bamasfault; obamanomics; obamasfault; obamnation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 04/01/2011 3:53:42 PM PDT by mewykwistmas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas

Yeah, but Costco has good, cheap prices. It more or less evens out < /s>


2 posted on 04/01/2011 3:56:57 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas

I’m so sick of this “the minimum wage should be able to support a family of 4” crap. the min wage should be for kids in high school. if you have a family of 4 and are still earning minimum wage, just maybe it’s possible that it’s not the employers fault. God, this country has turned upside down in the last 20 years. what the hell ?


3 posted on 04/01/2011 4:00:00 PM PDT by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas

Cmon. How much do Mexicans need to make if they’re living ten-to-a-bedroom?


4 posted on 04/01/2011 4:02:01 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (You is what you am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas
I like speaking to young people about the future. Especially about getting a job and employment.

I tell them that I know everyone is not cut out to go to college. I understand that. What I tell them is, even if you go to college, you HAVE to select some type of "marketable skill" to sell to a prospective employer. Just getting a degree in something does not mean you will get a job. A lot of college kids get degrees in subjects that there are few jobs for. I tell them to research a skill that you can use, that you can sell to an employer and show that employer that you can help his business.

Even if they are not going to college, then get training in a specialized skill you can sell to the employer. Auto mechanics, electrician, plumber, etc, etc.

I also tell them that if you think you are going to make a living, raise a family, buy a house, a car, save money for the future, working at McDonald's or Burger King, then you better think again. If you do not prepare yourself for a skill that you can market, then expect to live in the poor house the rest of your life. I also recommend to them the military service for four or five years. Learn a skill there that you can use on the outside. A kid wanting to be a cop cannot be a cop on the street until he is 21 because he cannot carry a weapon. But, in the military, he can be an MP at 18, carry a weapon, gain experience, etc, and use that for a future job with law enforcement.

If is about having a skill to sell an employer that you can use for a life time. A marketable skill.

5 posted on 04/01/2011 4:02:52 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (The Lord Said It and I Believe it. Read your Bible. These are the end time events.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas

” To achieve economic security, a single parent with two children needs an income of just over $30,000 a year—”nearly twice the federal minimum wage—while a two-income household needs almost $68,000.

The study then finds that, according to Labor Department projections, fewer than 13 percent of jobs to be created by 2018 will meet the economic security threshold for a single parent with two kids. Forty-three percent of those jobs will meet the threshold for a two-income household. “

Huh?????

Maybe someone smarter than I am can explain those numbers to me??


6 posted on 04/01/2011 4:02:52 PM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas

With gubment jobs paying more, on average, than the private sector, somethings got to give.


7 posted on 04/01/2011 4:02:52 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas

Yet another half truth study.

In California those making a minimum wage have about $4,500 more expendable money per year than those making the median income because of all the freebies government hands out.

Read here:
http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/11/29/ca-freebies-enrich-low-wage-workers/


8 posted on 04/01/2011 4:03:14 PM PDT by WayneLusvardi (It's more complex than it might seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas
This is the kind of garbage talk that comes out when lefties push for minimum wage increases.  Absolute lunacy.  

Minimum wage hikes don't make employers up wages of those who produce less, it just makes it illegal to hire them.   We need to understand that it's OK that a low wage job doesn't pay enough to support a large family, and that's why it's important to have a high paying job before trying to raise one.

9 posted on 04/01/2011 4:06:19 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Ogawd it’s you again.


10 posted on 04/01/2011 4:06:42 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (You is what you am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Ogawd it’s you again.


11 posted on 04/01/2011 4:10:20 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (You is what you am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
Maybe someone smarter than I am can explain those numbers to me??

that was my reaction when I read that.

12 posted on 04/01/2011 4:12:01 PM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

Yeah. The numbers don’t make sense.

Why would a two income house need 38,000 more than a 1 income house?

So they can buy a Mercedes?

Makes no sense.. Just like this study.


13 posted on 04/01/2011 4:12:59 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

This has to do with the reality that ‘good jobs’ all but gone and all we can do is sell Made in China iPads to each other. Many hardworking people can’y find good jobs. And not everyone can go to Harvard or invent something.

Did people live with minimum wage in the 50’s, 60’s, 90’s?


14 posted on 04/01/2011 4:13:21 PM PDT by mewykwistmas (We can either have a free market economy or socialism, TARPers, GM and GE can't have it both ways.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Ogawd it’s you again.


15 posted on 04/01/2011 4:14:40 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (You is what you am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas

Keep in mind, back then there was less stuff to buy. We didn’t have all of the gadgets we have today, heck a lot of families didn’t even have a car.


16 posted on 04/01/2011 4:14:43 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas

These are the things that make me scream. Those jobs are meant for students, part time work for stay at home moms, and retired persons.

They are not meant to support a single parent and two children. Maybe if people waited till they had a two-person marriage contract in hand, and decided how and when they could afford to have children, and then who would stay home with them - maybe they wouldn’t HAVE to try to live on $30,000.

The way they make this sound, women are in danger of waking up every day and SURPRISE, you’re pregnant!


17 posted on 04/01/2011 4:15:47 PM PDT by oldmomster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas

So few of these new jobs will be paying federal income taxes either. I guess thats one way to starve the beast.


18 posted on 04/01/2011 4:18:20 PM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

The problem with “marketable skills” is that it is too easy for companies to import workers with those skills when the American workers start having some bargaining power; to hear Bill Gates complain that Americans don’t go into computers anymore is just plain evil; his threats to move jobs to Vancouver or India if he doesn’t get his Asian slaves through the H1-B program is the reason why Americans don’t go into computers anymore.

The only decent jobs will be ones that can’t be outsourced (mechanics, electricians, plumbers, and the like); ideally, they should also be too complicated or dangerous for a 16 year-old Mexican high school dropout as well..


19 posted on 04/01/2011 4:19:34 PM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mewykwistmas

This is one of the consequences having a large national debt.

It creates a built in cost. The debt and taxes are uncontrollable costs that businesses must take into account when pricing their products competitively. Since businesses cannot control these costs, they have to focus on what they can control and that is the cost of labour.

Therefore, if you’re going to want to work in a global market, you are going to have to work at the lowest possible wages possible.


20 posted on 04/01/2011 4:19:55 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson