Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WaPo: Why is Obama pursuing a “Drill, Brazil, Drill” strategy?
American Thinker ^ | 03/28/2011 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 03/28/2011 7:35:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Good question! In fact, as the Washington Post editorial board notes, it’s actually a series of good questions. Not only does Barack Obama need to explain his enthusiasm for drilling and oil consumption apparently everywhere but in the US, he also needs to explain why the US wants to import oil from Brazil, but not ethanol:

Brazil already produces vast quantities of a fuel — ethanol — that the U.S. government, under a policy long supported by presidents and farm-state members of Congress from both parties, has promoted as a green alternative to gasoline. But the United States, protecting its own heavily subsidized ethanol industry by means of a 2.5 percent tariff and a 54-cent-per-gallon duty, prevents Americans from importing all but trivial amounts of the stuff from Brazil. Therefore, we need more oil — much of it imported. In Brasilia, Mr. Obama spoke of strengthening U.S.-Brazilian technical cooperation on ethanol but did not propose allowing U.S. protectionist measures to lapse after their scheduled expiration on Dec. 31.

As for offshore drilling, Mr. Obama’s enthusiasm for punching holes in the ocean floor off Brazil is hard to reconcile with his decision, announced Dec. 1, to keep the waters off the East and West coasts and the eastern Gulf of Mexico off-limits to exploration indefinitely. His policy was a reversal of an earlier decision he had made to open some of those areas. …

[I]t is tough to reconcile with U.S. eagerness to “help” Brazil pump oil off its coasts and ship it here. U.S. companies, enticed by government loan guarantees, are already lined up to sell Brazil drilling equipment and services. Forget the implications for U.S. dependency on foreign sources. What does this posture say about American regard for the natural environment outside U.S. territory?

It says this: we’re willing to let foreign nations extract resources in ways that we refuse to do in America. Either that’s because we don’t really think there’s anything wrong with those policies, or because we don’t give a damn what Brazil does to its own environment as long as we don’t have to do anything to ours to benefit by it. It’s arrogant either way, and hypocritical in all senses.

Give the Post some credit for highlighting these hypocrisies. Most of the rest of the media ignored them, just as they ignored the fact that Obama was cheerleading for Brazilian oil production at the same time he had launched a war against Libya. Hardly anyone has commented on the connection between those two actions, but Obama has to have his eye open for ways to increase supply and lower fuel prices in case Libya’s production stays off line for a long time, which looks like a pretty good bet. Otherwise, oil prices will skyrocket and the American economy will stall further into stagnation, which will mean a short political career for Obama.

He could solve that problem by pursuing a “Drill, Baby, Drill” policy here in the US. Unfortunately, Obama apparently wants Brazilians to do the job that he won’t do on oil as much as he wants NATO to do the job he won’t do on Western leadership.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brazil; drilling; energy; obama

1 posted on 03/28/2011 7:36:02 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

2 posted on 03/28/2011 7:40:29 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
November 2012 can't come soon enough. This poor excuse of leadership, this joker who works so hard against the best interests of the US, must be defeated by a large margin thereby sending a signal to the far left, “do not try to fool America again.”
3 posted on 03/28/2011 7:43:33 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

drill PING


4 posted on 03/28/2011 7:43:58 AM PDT by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

‘cause the personal payoff gets deposited directly to the Swiss bank account? ..bypassing Federal Transactional Surveillance....by the Treasury Dept.....sheesh...doesn’t everybody know that?!!/s


5 posted on 03/28/2011 7:45:04 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you do not, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The guy is a moron.


6 posted on 03/28/2011 7:45:29 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (The political 2012 is here....Let's get it done !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He’s saving American energy resources until he can nationalize/socialize our oil and gas industry...then he’ll drill, baby, drill!


7 posted on 03/28/2011 7:46:47 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

I think so, the consummately empty headed pliable doofus. Some will attribute his actions to cunning, American hating etc. I think its far simpler, he’s uncommonly stupid and easily lead by any shiny thing that might gain his short attention span.


8 posted on 03/28/2011 7:54:42 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Because he’s America’s first mole/foreign-agent President?


9 posted on 03/28/2011 7:55:25 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (“...crush the bourgeoisie... between the millstones of taxation and inflation." --Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Because this purple lipped clown don’t give a flying s—t about American interests.


10 posted on 03/28/2011 7:56:51 AM PDT by stbdside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

His hands are tied. If he permits drilling he loses his base.

He will not be mentally able to tolerate the shit that hits the fan on Pennsylvania Avenue if he reverses his course on envirowacko causes. They will drive his out of his mind.


11 posted on 03/28/2011 8:35:20 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because he’s America’s first mole/foreign-agent President?

I've been saying this for a year. I truly believe there's a conspiracy to destroy this country. I'm not the only one following his actions, cause and effect, and arrived at this hypothesis.

12 posted on 03/28/2011 9:04:34 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wonder if Obama is setting up his hill top home in Brazil for when he’s out of office,the freezer money would be safe.


13 posted on 03/28/2011 9:11:46 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because he’s America’s first mole/foreign-agent President?

Yup... Last presidential election we had the Manchurian candidate vs the Manchurian President. What a choice!
14 posted on 03/28/2011 9:23:18 AM PDT by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
...punching holes in the ocean floor off Brazil...
It's not happening "in the ocean floor off Brazil".

Interior Dept Gives Approval to Brazilian Oil Company’s Gulf of Mexico Deep Water Facility
The U.S. Interior Department said on Thursday it gave final approval for Petrobras to use the first ever deepwater floating production storage facility in the Gulf of Mexico.
The facility will be used when the company begins oil and natural gas production at its Chinook-Cascade project in the near future, the department said. Petrobras is based in Brazil.

How about in our own back yard?

Petrobras' Cascade and Chinook oilfields are located in the Walker Ridge block, around 300km (180 miles) south of the Louisiana coast...

They're not Petrobras' oilfields, they're America's and we're giving away all revenue from the resources in our own EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zones).
Proclamation 5030 - Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States of America March 10, 1983
...with regard to other activities for the economic exploitation and exploration of the zone...
The government manages and controls marine affairs up to 200 miles off the coast.

15 posted on 03/28/2011 9:36:28 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Easy answer. It is not the US.


16 posted on 03/28/2011 10:17:23 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson