Posted on 03/24/2011 1:29:57 AM PDT by Scanian
Wow. How completely objective and informed of you to say so.
All Beck has ever done is to let us hear directly from the Extremist Left, in their own words.
"Beck conspiracy alarmism" is an elitist fabrication designed from whole cloth with the sole and despicable goal of dissembling upon the facts and discrediting one of the bravest, most selfless American Hero Patriots this side of (the male side) Sarah Palin.
Why does it surprise me to hear you utter such projectile vomit here on FreeRepublic?
;-\
Caution to the wind indeed....I've stated that with Obama, the left over reached in their, collective, effort to grab for the brass “tyrannical” ring, and missed....they now know they have to go down fighting. Prepare.
I bet the weasel has his dough already too.
Yeah, I’m such an elitist.
With $15 in my pocket and zero in the bank.
Give it up. You can be as broke as a convict and unknown to anybody but God and still hold views like that.
You celebrity/politician cheerleaders need to cool your jets and accept the fact that not everybody is going to share your viewpoint.
“All Beck has ever done is to let us hear directly from the Extremist Left, in their own words.”
You are 100% correct and have expressed my sentiments about Beck perfectly.
I hope the rumors are true and that he does leave FOX NEWS and start his own channel.
It was recorded over the last weekend from a Progressive’s closed door confernce at Pace University in NYC. Beck laid it out Tuesday morning on his radio show, on-line at The Blaze and again on TV that evening. Rush covered it on his show yesterday as did others.
Many seem to discount Beck as alarmism. Be mindfull that many discounted those considered alarmists in pre-Hitler Germany as well. My grandfather was one of those who knew Hitler before his rise and spent nearly the entire war in a coal mining labor camp because he tried to warn the people around his Bavarian village.
Can Beck be considered an alarmist? Sure but should that in any way keep you from checking out his stroies for any sort of veracity? Never. It doesn’t take much to check it out and any tidbit of truth should sound the warning bells. Should we act on every little thing, no, but file it away ready to be acted upon if the file keeps getting larger.
The media is not going to tell us the truth, period. So does it not become our personal duty to find it? When looking for intelligence (not those who are intelligent) it is most often the obscure little tidbits that lead the way to what you seek.
Thirty four years ago I belonged to a union that was going to go on strike. I attended a small meeting, three or four members, where it was discussed what to do with the people who crossed the picket line and go to work. The suggestion was proffered that we should cut the tires of the “line crossers”. I objected but it did not seem to make any difference in the discussion. Luckily, the strike never came off.
This is one tactic of the unions, small groups do the dirty work and the rest use a “That's terrible" excuse, but they know and they approve.
What the hell does that mean!
We can no longer “lay low”. Patriots are in for the fight of our lives. We are fighting for the heart and soul of our Country.
I'm tired of all of the political posturing from entrenched, conservative in name only politicians. We need people who stand up to these assaults on our Constitution and fight back hard,against those who seek to destroy our American way of life. So stand up and lead or get out of the way.
Odd that nothing came up.
Oh, well, if I did wrong, I’m sure I’ll hear about it.
No biggie.
I think it was yesterday, from The Blaze. But that's okay. The more that read this the better.
Anywho, if the DOJ went after 'Mr Coin Man' for Domestic Terrorism(1), why isn't Eric Holder pursing this Commie SOB?
[that rhetorical, we know why ;-)]
(1) Destabilizing the US economy with 'phony' currency.
You missed it, completely. Again.
I merely pointed out the vast gulf of difference between "viewpoints" and "facts." While typically an "elitist" malaise, one needn't be an elitist to be thus afflicted.
Case in point.
;-\
He is not the only one. Rachel Maddow was spewing this garbage weeks ago. Maybe she is first on their propaganda push list.
Seems like sedition to me.
There is plenty of money for those who realize that money is a symbol of work, innovation, creating. There is an infinite amount. But for those who think money is a “thing” and that you get it by TAKING it from those who have it, that sort of money is definitely finite and there is not plenty of it. The left has a screwy idea of “money” that causes them to think that if someone else has a LOT it means that others necessarily have a LITTLE, as opposed to the benevolent view that it money is a function of, reflection of one’s efforts, intentions and productivity.
There are hundreds of lefty blogs run by 50 IQ apes who have “plans” to overthrow America and set up a communist workers “paradise.”
Why should Lerner be any different? He’s another loud-mouth coward who will do nothing to carry out his plan to transform America into a brown shirt dictatorship.
It’s one thing to show up in force in left wing Madistan and scream for communism. It’s a whole other world to goosestep down Main Street America and try to forcibly impose left wing fascism.
Lawn bags are cheap, tree branches are everywhere and the front end loaders are fueled.
That “elitist” tag is a cheap shot that is aimed at anybody who takes issue with certain politicians and media personalities of a controversial nature.
We are “elitist.” We get “talking points” We are “trolls.”
Horse crap! When those cheap shots are taken, it just weakens your own case because it shows that insults are your only defense of personalities who, for the most part, are not shrinking violets and do not need defensive and/or paranoid protectors to look out for their honor.
What do we have to do, mark any observation about people like Beck with “IMHO?” That’s silly. You know it’s opinion when you read “typical Beck conspiracy alarmism.”
It’s as bad as some readers who demand “/s” to be written anytime some irony is intended.
If I say, “Beck is mainly interested in selling gold and survival food,” is it necessary to mark that as my personal viewpoint? Of course that’s what it is. What else would it be, unless I cited a reference?
I can’t claim it as fact without providing evidence. And neither could you claim the contrary.
I’ve been listening to Beck fairly regularly since he started here in Tampa 10 or so years ago. I’ve got a feel for what he does and I have my opinion.
So do you, obviously, so carry on. I don’t care to hear anymore about him, however. (I actually gave him credit about the Lerner thing. I’m not being unfair.)
Here it is, one more time. Read it slowly, and actually speak the words if it helps...
"...While typically an "elitist" malaise, one needn't be an elitist to be thus afflicted. Case in point.
See? That whole, numb, libtard-mirroring wheeze was entirely unneccessary. You poor, simple brain fart. Go puke your retarded babble-spew on someone else. You've gone way over the edge... you're in the Twilight Zone.
Imbecile.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.