I do know this: for a while there, various high-ranking leaders were saying if you don’t like the repeal of DADT, then get out. But there is no provision for soldiers to get out if they don’t like it. So, if a soldier just signed up on a new 6-year enlistment right before they repealed the law, too bad. That soldier’s just stuck. Although the Army might make an exception if a soldier’s in an overstrength MOS and doesn’t owe the Army anything (needs of the Army and all that).
That’s actually addressed in the column. It stated that military personnel will not be permitted to leave early because of their objections to serving with homosexuals.
“That’s actually addressed in the column. It stated that military personnel will not be permitted to leave early because of their objections to serving with homosexuals.”
They must not have heard of the term “Conscientious Scruple”.
“...It is beyond governmental authority to force these Americans into situations that compromise their morals. The Selective Training & Service Act of 1940 permits the granting of Conscientious Objector status to “One who by reason of religious training and belief is conscientiously opposed to participation in war.” Little known is: People v. Stewart, 7 Cal. 143, “Conscientious Scruple. A conscientious scruple against . . . doing military duty, or the like is an objection or repugnance growing out of the fact that the person believes the thing demanded of him is morally wrong, his conscience being the sole guide to his decision . . . ” (Black’s Law Dictionary). This “Conscientious Scruple” provision appears to give Marines of conscience a legal remedy for a morally compromising situation of serving under or with Marine homosexuals...”
http://www.thebutter-cutter.com/Marines_of_Conscience_or_Ho.php
______________________
Our boots on the ground shouldn’t be subjected to this perverted indoctrination. It is a form of “sexual harassment” to force them to view images or listen to lectures promoting a perverted sexual lifestyle that up until the hippie free love generation was considered a deviant behavior by mental health professionals, and rightfully so.