Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fukushima Nuclear Plant To Be Decommissioned: Govt
Nikkei ^ | 03/20/11

Posted on 03/20/2011 7:13:04 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Fukushima Nuclear Plant To Be Decommissioned: Govt

TOKYO (Kyodo)--The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant is in no condition to restart and is most likely to be decommissioned as it has caused many critical problems since a devastating earthquake and tsunami hit northeastern Japan on March 11, the top government spokesman suggested Sunday.

''Looking at the situation objectively, (the answer to the question of) whether it can be operated again is clear,'' Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said at a news conference, when asked whether the government plans to close the plant once its overheating reactors are brought under control.

It is the first time that a senior government official has mentioned about the likelihood of it being decommissioned.

(Excerpt) Read more at e.nikkei.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fukushima; japan; reactors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2011 7:13:06 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; sushiman; Ronin; AmericanInTokyo; gaijin; struggle; DTogo; GATOR NAVY; Iris7; ...

So Japan will have new landmarks: six huge concrete monuments of entombed reactors.


2 posted on 03/20/2011 7:14:54 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
And this is a surprise?
3 posted on 03/20/2011 7:15:16 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The seawater injections alone foretold that one. Though 5 and 6 were not pumped with seawater if memory serves.

The nuclear physicist I know told me that as soon as they did that, the resale value went to zero. Let alone the physical damage...


4 posted on 03/20/2011 7:17:41 AM PDT by fred2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

They’ll be replaced with modern reactors, probably thorium, and probably on higher ground.


5 posted on 03/20/2011 7:18:30 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Those Japanese... they are so inscrutable.

Though it seems rather obvious that they should not only be decommissioned but should be condemned, it’s just the last thing that would be of concern right now.


6 posted on 03/20/2011 7:19:23 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fred2008

I suspect that they will junk the whole place.


7 posted on 03/20/2011 7:20:05 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
So Japan will have new landmarks: six huge concrete monuments of entombed reactors.

And six new coal/natural gas fired power plants to take their place.

8 posted on 03/20/2011 7:37:52 AM PDT by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Weren’t they going to dismantle the plant anyway because the reactors were getting old to start with? They may keep the two newest reactors, though.


9 posted on 03/20/2011 7:46:17 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

Time for the USA to start construction of a couple large LNG export terminals and sign some long term contracts with Japan for natural gas to fuel the replacement generating stations.

Or even smarter would be construction of a few large scale Fischer–Tropsch process facilities local to large natural gas production fields and export it as a liquid, as well as supplement our countries diesel fuel supply with it.


10 posted on 03/20/2011 8:30:45 AM PDT by CarmichaelPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CarmichaelPatriot
I'm not sure if anyone wants an LNG terminal at a US port--if an LNG tanker goes ka-boom! it could do it with the force of a tactical nuclear warhead (about 1200 to 1500 tones of TNT).
11 posted on 03/20/2011 8:41:55 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; topher; M. Espinola; Quix; Joya; blam; reed13; B4Ranch; investigateworld
27 Signs That the Nuclear Crisis in Japan Is Much Worse Than Either the Mainstream Media or the Japanese Government Have Been Telling Us

This excerpt especially caught my eye:

24 The president of France's nuclear safety authority says that this crisis is now almost as bad as Chernobyl was ....

"It's clear we are at Level 6, that's to say we're at a level in between what happened at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl."

But that item is only # 24. Please read the other three.

I'm still shaking my head about 600,000 spent fuel rods stored without containment . . .

12 posted on 03/20/2011 8:43:51 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Ecclesiastes 5:10 - 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Thanks.

Lord, have mercy.


13 posted on 03/20/2011 8:48:56 AM PDT by Joya (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Procrastination! Procrastination! Had the plant been decommisioned when it was originally supposed to half their problems would have disappeared.


14 posted on 03/20/2011 9:04:56 AM PDT by R4nd0m
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
I'm not sure if anyone wants an LNG terminal at a US port--if an LNG tanker goes ka-boom! it could do it with the force of a tactical nuclear warhead (about 1200 to 1500 tones of TNT).

We already have 2 LNG terminals in Gulf Coast ports (I can't remember which cities). The US imports LNG from Trinidad and Tobago...but it only represents 1% or 2% of what we consume. If not for hydraulic fracturing we would be importing much more LNG by now.

15 posted on 03/20/2011 9:25:23 AM PDT by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Wait a minute - don't you think they might be a little hasty, here?

16 posted on 03/20/2011 9:26:06 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

That was known soon as seawater went in.


17 posted on 03/20/2011 10:00:53 AM PDT by Freddd (NoPA ngineers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; SteveH; SE Mom
Pretty sure that was a fore-ordained conclusion once they started with the sea-water cooldown, so no surprise. It's possible they could save the #5 and #6 reactors, but they too are closer to their end-of-life that the start so it would make more economic sense to shutter and entomb the entire plant and rebuild elsewhere.

Ping to Steve and Mom. :^)

18 posted on 03/20/2011 10:58:34 AM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
I'm still shaking my head about 600,000 spent fuel rods stored without containment . . .

I suggest you don't inquire about the quantity of used fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pools at the US plants, courtesy of Dingy Harry and the rest of the luddites.

19 posted on 03/20/2011 11:02:19 AM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fred2008

“The seawater injections alone foretold that one. Though 5 and 6 were not pumped with seawater if memory serves.”

That’s right, 2 or 3 of the reactors are servicable, 5 and 6 had no damage, so if they are shutting them all down and not just the damaged ones its a political decision and not a technical one.

If seawater is really that deadly, its a travesty that they (or we) couldnt airlift the distilled water they needed in the first 48 hours when they needed it.


20 posted on 03/20/2011 11:36:53 AM PDT by WOSG (Carpe Diem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson