Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blue Over Green Energy Promises
davidlimbaugh.com ^ | 03/17/11 | david limbaugh

Posted on 03/17/2011 6:18:35 PM PDT by lancer256

The promises of pie-in-the-sky liberal environmentalists that we can convert to "clean" energy sources and stimulate our economy are based on dubious environmental and economic assumptions, fantastic notions about alternative energy, and a disturbing acceptance of the tyrannies inherent in command-control economies.

It would be bad enough if President Obama and his Democratic allies were pushing budget-busting green energy solutions during an economic boom and times of a manageable national debt. But it's inconceivable that they would do so under the current dire fiscal circumstances.

They begin with the assumption that we have an urgent need to restructure our energy sources for environmental, economic and national security reasons. It's interesting they don't see the same urgency in our looming entitlement crisis -- a menace that will swallow our entire budget in a few generations, absent major reform.

They attempt to bolster that assumption by manipulating the playing field to deliberately suppress our production of oil and nuclear energy and then claim we have a catastrophic supply problem. To be sure, our supply of oil isn't unlimited, but if Democrats got off their pristine high horses about domestic oil production, the problem would be considerably mitigated. A logical first step would be to admit they are smothering production, an objectively provable fact about which the president brazenly prevaricated earlier this week.

(Excerpt) Read more at davidlimbaugh.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: davidlimbaugh; environment; liberals

1 posted on 03/17/2011 6:18:41 PM PDT by lancer256
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lancer256

David Limbaugh is brilliant. Wish he would run against Claire McCaskill for senate in the 2012 Missouri election. We need MORE like him in DC


2 posted on 03/17/2011 6:26:06 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer256
WHAT?!?!?!

You mean we can't get everyone a green job within four years and actually save money and have no pollution using rainbow power anytime soon?

3 posted on 03/17/2011 6:26:44 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer256

Dealing with this nations energy policy is “above his paygrade” except when it comes to off shore drilling, ANWR..............


4 posted on 03/17/2011 6:28:03 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

I hear the next big energy source is unicorn farts. Rainbow power is so 2010.


5 posted on 03/17/2011 6:29:36 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lancer256
Conclusion of the article: With all these unrealistic assumptions, dubious projected benefits, additional problems and complications, and enormous costs, one has to wonder why, apart from a blind faith in the secular religion of environmentalism, liberals are pushing these programs so vigorously.

In the town near me, it is a combination of liberal greenies with no clue about energy generation or economics and gullible rubes with no clue about anything, and just enough evil people (former drug dealers, etc) to push the alt energy project to their financial benefit baited by even more evil people in a neighboring state who promised them shares in the their alt energy startup (so Limbaugh is wrong about that part, there are "investors" who are interested in this, but mostly sleazebuckets looking to cash in on government subsidies rationalizing it as saving the earth)

6 posted on 03/17/2011 6:56:18 PM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer256
To be sure, our supply of oil isn't unlimited,

Until science can prove otherwise I'll discount that notion.
Fact is, we don't have enough facts to surmise. The earth may be
a constant manufacturer of oil, we already know methane.

All those dead materials are constantly being flush into the earth
and over the 100's of millions of years it could take 10-million
years to deplete the oil But then it could be a normal constant of our planet.
Just my speculation.


/Salute

7 posted on 03/17/2011 8:02:39 PM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lancer256

Could it be they are frigging lying?


8 posted on 03/17/2011 8:13:44 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson