Skip to comments.
The Fast Fix: Palin & Pelosi, equally unpopular
Yahoo News ^
| 3/16/2011
| Yahoo News/Washington Post
Posted on 03/16/2011 10:30:20 AM PDT by adorno
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: jennychase
If she is so unpopular, why they want to write about her?
They haven't stopped writing, negatively, about her for 2.5 years, 24/7. Since that propaganda didn't work, they will try this one.
Looks like they want to make her more popular.
Not possible, the world knows about her. Why don't they try to make romney, mitt or newt 'more popular' with 24/7 negative reports? Their propaganda tactics are so old they are boring - but that's all they have.
To: adorno
The flood of polls coming out lately showing Palin with bad numbers are all designed to send her a message. They know she is deciding and they are hoping to discourage her.
22
posted on
03/16/2011 11:06:50 AM PDT
by
RED SOUTH
(Follow me on twitter @redsouth72)
To: RED SOUTH
I agree with you! They are trying to pick the candidate again. If she were so unpopular, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, HLN AB and all the blogosphere wouldn’t obsess over every single word she utters. A truly inept person gets ignored. Like Nancy Pelosi.
23
posted on
03/16/2011 11:09:21 AM PDT
by
sappy
(let taxpayers bargain collectively)
To: adorno
One contrast. Nancy Pelosi will never be president. Sarah Palin will.
You Betcha.
24
posted on
03/16/2011 11:09:25 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Is it time to Drill Baby Drill yet?)
To: adorno
If she's so unpopular how come this book sold a gazillion copies?
And this one sold 4
25
posted on
03/16/2011 11:10:49 AM PDT
by
erod
(Unlike the President I am a true Chicagoan.)
To: adorno
The media is systematically comparing Sarah to all the most unpopular leftist and liberal characters from Al Sharpton to Nancy Pelosi hoping to marginalize her and paint her as a fringe personality.
Won’t work.
26
posted on
03/16/2011 11:11:26 AM PDT
by
paulycy
(Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: McGruff
Nancy Pelosi will never be president.
For 2 years, Nancy was the "unofficial" president, with Obama being the "bill-signer" in-chief.
27
posted on
03/16/2011 11:13:14 AM PDT
by
adorno
To: Cicero
“They appear to have missed the most important connecting pointthat both names begin with a P.”
Close — but, not quite there. Alliteration is the connecting theme of this Palin/Pelosi Popularity Poll Progressive Propaganda Production.
To: adorno
Can you believe this? They reported this on ABC news (radio)last hour!
Everything that is going on and the msm ‘reports’ this.
To: RobbyS
They are not afraid of Mitt, who is a modern day
Dewey Wendell Wilkie.
There, fixed it.*
(At least Dewey was a successful racket-busting prosecutor. Willard just provided the template for the Kenyan usurper's monstrous health care boondoggle.*)
30
posted on
03/16/2011 11:25:18 AM PDT
by
Emperor Palpatine
(Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!)
To: sappy; RED SOUTH
RE :”
I agree with you! They are trying to pick the candidate again. If she were so unpopular, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, HLN AB and all the blogosphere wouldnt obsess over every single word she utters. A truly inept person gets ignored. Like Nancy Pelosi.”
Actually the MSM did smell blood when Pelosi was Speaker and was putting her foot in her mouth. They did follow her around and bait her to give more stupid opinions on camera. That one time she actually ran off to hide in China to avoid their questions. They seem to have lost interest now that she has no power, and no-one knew who she was in 2008. But 2009-2010 they found a winning story, get Pelosi to explain stuff on camera, and it was priceless.
None of this makes Pelosi presidential material.
31
posted on
03/16/2011 11:33:01 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: adorno
or rather....the cartoon character out there who is being portrayed as Sarah Palin by the media is equally unpopular
To: adorno
ROFLOL Nancy book sold what 1000 copies adn Palins book sold what? I don’t think so Yapoo but nice try!
To: RobbyS
I’m not discounting the ‘rock and a hard place’ reality here. I agree with that description. Some of the other issues you touched on, were accurate too. There still has to be a balance, and I’m not convinced she got that right.
I’ll give you an example. I would have advised her not to participate in the Alaska series. You want folks to feel like they know you, without seeing you in the every day grind. My personal thought on that, is that it makes you look far more ‘common’ than you want people to see you as, if you’re planning to run for the presidency. There needs to be aura of respect, that commonality tends to break down.
I know a lot of people who support her probably gobbled that up, and I’m not saying she did a bad job at all. I respect that people enjoyed it. I’m just saying that for some folks, it may have been the wrong tactic. Palin may have won new converts. She may also have alienated people.
That’s just my take on it.
I do believe than over-exposure is a real concern.
Thanks for the response.
34
posted on
03/16/2011 11:43:56 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Here's the proof of Obama's U. S. citizenship: " " Good enough for our 3 branches...)
To: RED SOUTH
The flood of polls coming out lately showing Palin with bad numbers are all designed to send her a message. They know she is deciding and they are hoping to discourage her.Bingo! We have a winnah!
The fake polls and hit pieces that try to make the case that Sarah Palin is wildly unpopular with the voting public are all intended to discourage Palin and dampen the enthusiasm of her supporters. Both will fail, big-time. Sarah Palin isn't driven by polls or what the leftist media says about her. If she runs, it will be to actually serve her country, not because she dreamed of being president since she was 12 or to enjoy the perks of power. Palin's supporters (Jim proudly raises his hand) know the leftmedia is dead-set against Palin and that they always try to chose the Republican candidate - the most liberal and/or hopeless - for us. Not this time. If Palin runs, and I think she will, she'll thrash Obama in the 2012 election. He is an utter failure on many fronts and his 'coolness' is now being seen for what it is: an aloofness and obvious disinterest for anything that (a) isn't on his personal agenda and, (b) requires some work on his part. Obama will be gone by January 2013 and Sarah Palin, if she runs, will replace him. The leftmedia, with their BS stories and fake polls can go pound sand.
To: RobbyS
They are not afraid of Mitt because he is a RINO..One of the good old boy society of the democrat party..
36
posted on
03/16/2011 11:58:39 AM PDT
by
PLD
To: sickoflibs
So, what has Sarah ever said commensurate with the scorching lava spewing from Pelosi’s butt? Palin/Rubio ‘12! Bob
37
posted on
03/16/2011 12:07:10 PM PDT
by
alstewartfan
("I don't wanna think. Just leave me here to drink, wrapped up in the warmth of New York City." Al S.)
To: alstewartfan
RE :”
So, what has Sarah ever said commensurate with the scorching lava spewing from Pelosis butt? ”
Not a good comparison, Pelosi and Palin is like apples and oranges.
Was Palin trying to be generally popular anyway? There is really no way to know for sure.
One thing is similar. At the end of last year 2010 when Pelosi ran for House minority leader her liberal supporters used the argument that the attacks by the evil special interests were proof of Pelosi’s effectiveness which is why she should continue to lead them. And on the Palin fan side we hear the argument that attacks from the left are proof...
38
posted on
03/16/2011 12:39:01 PM PDT
by
sickoflibs
("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: sickoflibs
Yes, but there is no substance to the left’s attacks. Or the elitist “right” either, for that matter. Bob
39
posted on
03/16/2011 1:03:50 PM PDT
by
alstewartfan
("I don't wanna think. Just leave me here to drink, wrapped up in the warmth of New York City." Al S.)
To: sickoflibs; alstewartfan
One thing is similar. At the end of last year 2010 when Pelosi ran for House minority leader her liberal supporters used the argument that the attacks by the evil special interests were proof of Pelosis effectiveness which is why she should continue to lead them. And on the Palin fan side we hear the argument that attacks from the left are proof...
Oh Really?!
So the supporters of Pelosi are comparable to the supporters of Palin?
Do you really believe that pile of crap you are shoveling?
Do you really believe that Pelosi Supporters are honest people?
Do you actually believe they are sincere people?
Do you really believe Pelosi supporters are actually knowledeable about the issues?
Now ask yourself the same questions concerning Palin supporters.
You are suffering from a very bad case of relativism.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson