To: Rummyfan
Theres nothing that the word barbaric achieves that the words absolutely unacceptable would not have achieved, Trudeau, the Liberal immigration critic, said.
No, Trudeau, you moron, "absolutely unacceptable" doesn't go far enough because it doesn't describe why: because these actions lie completely outside the confines of civilized behavior; that is, they are typical of the behavior of barbarians, people whose ethics and ways of life are inimical to our Western civilization. No matter how anthropologists may map them onto civilized society as "functional equivalents," they aren't equivalent.
10 posted on
03/16/2011 3:59:20 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: aruanan
“There’s nothing that the word “barbaric” achieves that the words “absolutely unacceptable” would not have achieved...”
Absolutely unacceptable is urinating in the sink. Barbaric is stoning some woman who went out of her house without a male escort. Barbaric is cutting someone’s head off while calling them an “Infidel”. Barbaric is hijacking planes and crashing them into a building killing innocent people. There is power in words and phrases. Barbaric is the “nicest” word to describe the radical Islamists. IMHO
To: aruanan
Re post 10, good post. But what do you do when your fellow countrymen insist on electing morons?
18 posted on
03/16/2011 5:50:41 AM PDT by
Former Proud Canadian
(How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson