Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
More here

Another smear against Rep. King by the former 'paper of record'


By Richard N. Weltz

It's not surprising, but it is another blood-boiling instance of the self-proclaimed "paper of record" acting more like the propaganda organ for the left wing of the Democratic Party than a legitimate news venue.

Just a day after a very strongly worded editorial slam at Congressman Peter King over his committee's planned hearings into the radicalization of domestic Muslim community members, the Gray Lady follows up with a two-pronged smear attack.

Right on the front page of the March 9 edition, the paper ran an article headlined: "For Lawmaker Examining Terror, a Pro-I.R.A. Past."  Reporter Scott Shane, reaching back into the past some 30-plus years, advises readers:

As Mr. King, a Republican, rose as a Long Island politician in the 1980s, benefiting from strong Irish-American support, the I.R.A. was carrying out a bloody campaign of bombing and sniping, targeting the British Army, Protestant paramilitaries and sometimes pubs and other civilian gathering spots.

Although the article delves deep and wide into King's support for the Irish Republicans -- one shared by a considerable number of Americans at the time -- he does admit that King eventually played a key role in settling the conflict:

In later years, by all accounts, Mr. King became an important go-between in talks that led to peace in Northern Ireland, drawing on his personal contacts with leaders of I.R.A.'s political wing, Sinn Fein, and winning plaudits from both Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, the former president and the British prime minister.

Meanwhile, on its Web-site blog, "City Room," one Noam Cohen mocks King with claims that the Congressman's 2004 book, Vale of Tears, is nothing but a "barely veiled ... thriller" about King himself, which Cohen would have readers believe shows the Republican Representative to be a hypocrite at best, a long-term schemer at worst:

As Mr. King takes the spotlight this week with his hearings on the radicalization of American Muslims, "Vale of Tears" shows he has long been considering the dangers posed by radical Muslims, as well as what role a mere congressman can play in protecting his country.

Those of us who are not in the business of denying Islamic radicalism, apologizing for it, or painting it with whitewash will welcome the opening of hearings which are long past due to attempt to discover the causes of why so many domestic terrorists are able to be enlisted in a jihadi cause against their own country by one particular group following one particular book.

2 posted on 03/10/2011 6:49:52 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

The importance of these hearings is monumental and prehaps even historical. This is the line in the sand and izzlum knows it. I hope he goes into the writings of the koran and hadeethaa and all the other hate literature of this cancer.

He has stood firm by not letting enemies “water down” the hearings by introducing side shows. We all know it that if that happened, the terrorists from the splc would spin this out of control and turn it into an anti Tea Party diatribe.

Pray for this man, because the work he is doing is of historical importance.

izzlum knows this, and Rep. King’s life and the lives of his family, are in great danger.


4 posted on 03/10/2011 7:06:21 AM PST by ConradofMontferrat (PS. The muzlim nations think my handle is a prime example of "hate speach." Oh Well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Lets stop acting like leftists when it comes to King. Instead of defending the indefensible, lets ask why our side was so stupid to put a past supporter of terrorism in the chairmanship of the Homeland Security Commitee. Anybody with a little knowledge of King knew he was a supporter and vocal backer of the Provos. For the last 15 years I knew this would eventually bite us in the ass. Instead of whining unfair, lets admit we were stupid for having King be a front man for anything to do with terrorism. Is there nobody else in the GOP who could have sat in this position. Instead our side selects the only representative who supported pub bombings in the past. This reminds me of the 90’s, when some of those selected to lead the correct impeachment of Slick were found out to have cheated on their wives also. The stupidity of our Congressional leaders never fails to amaze me anymore.


5 posted on 03/10/2011 7:10:05 AM PST by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson