Jamese, this is now the fourth invitation Im extending to you to repeat on an actual Islamic thread what youve so far confined to birther threads. Namely, your liberal-letter-perfect defense of Islam. If you really believe it, then why confine it to threads not related to Islam? Why not put it out there for broader FR consumption?
Ill make it easy for you. Multiple choice. Do you believe:
(1) Islam is a bloodthirsty cult that requires, according to the quran, its adherents to cut the throats of infidels, or
(2) Islam is a mainstream, peaceful religion hijacked by a minority of extremists. I.e.: that its the moral equivalent of Christianity, save for a handful of radicals that enable Islamophobes to unfairly malign it.
Given the hours you spend harassing people on eligibility threads, surely you can spare a few seconds to clarify this point. Even your sole defender, Kenny Bunk, admits youve gone overboard on the shadenfreude. [I.e.: youve done a whiz-poor job of concealing your gloating over the courts refusal to rule on the Natural Born Citizen issue.] How about a veneer of balance? Its not asking too much, is it?
It was nice talking to you but I’m going back to the topic of my thesis now, which is my primary posting interest.
Take care.
Either you are dishonest and inconsistent, or you could very well answer the multiple choice question by going with (2). Your dodge doesn’t surprise me. You like pimping for Islam when you’re confident of not getting caught, but you don’t dare do it in a more open and honest way.
Btw, as a Lutheran, what do you think of the ordination of practicing homosexuals?
Oh, and btw, not to dispute your intelligence, but (1) and (2) are mutually exclusive. I understand that cognitive dissonance is a specialty of liberals, however, and contradictions/irrationality/illogic are their stock and trade.