Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Siachen, Dhruv proves a world-beater (Indian helicoter)
Business Standard, India ^ | March 7, 2011, | Ajai Shukla

Posted on 03/06/2011 8:09:11 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

In Siachen, Dhruv proves a world-beater

Ajai Shukla / Bangalore March 7, 2011, 0:48 IST

It was a brutal test of helicopter and pilot. As the Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH) shuddered towards the icy helipad on a 21,000-foot ledge overlooking the Siachen Glacier, the pilots could see wreckage from earlier helicopter crashes dotting the base of the vertical ice walls on either side. Ahead lay the Indian Army’s infamous Sonam Post, the highest inhabited spot on earth, and an extreme example of why the military so urgently wants the Dhruv, which has been customised by Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) for high altitude operations.

Very quickly, the Dhruv demonstrated its superiority over the military’s tiny, single-engine Cheetah helicopters, which can barely lift 20 kilos of payload to Sonam. Touching down on a tiny H-shape formed on the snow with perforated iron sheets, the Dhruv’s pilots signalled to one of the soldiers on Sonam to climb aboard. Effortlessly, the Dhruv took off, circled the post and landed again. Another soldier clambered onto the helicopter and the process was repeated, then with a third, and then a fourth soldier. Even with all Sonam’s defenders on board, the twin-engine Dhruv — painted incongruously in the peacock regalia of the IAF’s aerobatics team, Sarang — lifted off and landed back safely.

“This helicopter is simply unmatched at high altitudes,” says Group Captain Unni Nair, HAL’s chief helicopter test pilot, who flew the Dhruv that August morning during “hot-and-high” trials at Sonam. That term means flying at extreme altitudes in summer, when the heat-swollen oxygen is even thinner than usual. “The army wanted the Dhruv to lift 200 kilos to Sonam; we managed to carry 600 kilos.”

Powering that world-beating performance is a new helicopter engine, called the Shakti, which HAL commissioned French engine-maker, Turbomeca, to design for operations along India’s high-altitude borders. It is this engine that makes the new Dhruv Mark III — the first five of which were delivered to the army this month — far superior to the Mark I and Mark II Dhruvs, which were built with a less versatile engine. The Shakti, which will start being built under licence at HAL soon, will now power an entire family of HAL-built helicopters: an armed version of the Dhruv; the Light Combat Helicopter (LCH); and the single-engine Light Utility Helicopter that is still on the drawing board.

The Shakti-powered Dhruv Mark III is changing the operational dynamics on India’s high-altitude Himalayan defences. The capability to airlift soldiers will allow far-flung posts to be manned with fewer soldiers. In a crisis, jawans can be airlifted quickly from lower altitudes to threatened areas, and casualties can be evacuated.

HAL Bangalore has already begun handing over Dhruv Mark IIIs to the Leh-based 205 Aviation Squadron for operations in Siachen. With the military demanding 159 Dhruvs in quick time, HAL can hardly build these helicopters fast enough. This year’s production rate of 25 Dhruvs will be accelerated from 2012 to 36 helicopters annually. The current order includes 54 weaponised Dhruvs — termed Advanced Light Helicopter — Weapons Systems Integrated, or ALH-WSI — armed with anti-aircraft and anti-tank missiles, rockets and a 20-millimetre turret gun. The ALH-WSI is scheduled to begin weapons trials in Orissa in April.

The success of the ALH programme, heralded by the Dhruv Mark III, comes after years of struggle and criticism. Last August, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) noted, “Ninety per cent of the value of material used in each ALH is still imported from foreign suppliers.”

But HAL chief Ashok Nayak and his helicopter chief, Soundara Rajan, point out that indigenisation does not mean building every component of an aircraft. Citing the example of the Dhruv’s HAL-built mission computer, Rajan asks whether the imported microchips inside make the mission computer any less indigenous. He sums up HAL’s helicopter strategy as follows: “We will design our helicopters; develop the critical technologies of helicopter transmissions; manufacture composites; and integrate and assemble the helicopter. We will outsource the manufacture of sub-assemblies and components and structures to any vendor on the globe that offers us cost-effective solutions.".


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; hal; helicopter; siachen

1 posted on 03/06/2011 8:09:21 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If it performs that well at 21KFt, I wonder what its sea level performance is? What payload, top speed.


2 posted on 03/06/2011 8:20:27 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Structural and aerodynamic load limits would constrain the lifting and speed performance at sea level to within normal bounds. It really is optimized to high altitude.


3 posted on 03/06/2011 8:24:29 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture (Could be worst in 40 years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve86
Look like a damn ordinary euro-weenie chopper to me. It's the engine that's the big difference. What did the frogs do to enhance high altitude performance? Additional compressor stage on the turbine? Come on. Tell! Enquiring minds need to know because we have the same hi altitude ops chopper problem in A-stan.

BTW, the Russki Kamev choppers with the contra rotating main rotor and no tail rotor are the bomb! Uncle Sam, can we have one?

4 posted on 03/06/2011 8:39:58 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (Odd, but I never had to ask, "Who, or what exactly is Dwight Eisenhower?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It looks good. Nice.


5 posted on 03/06/2011 9:29:39 PM PST by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

I wonder if they are going to market it. There doesn’t seem to be much competition and there are specialized needs for it.


6 posted on 03/06/2011 10:18:42 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Air India photos

https://picasaweb.google.com/110614958773855914651/AeroIndia2011#slideshow/5571577552914613106

7 posted on 03/06/2011 10:39:29 PM PST by smokingfrog ( BORN free - taxed to DEATH (and beyond) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

“...the Russki Kamev choppers with the contra rotating main rotor and no tail rotor...”

Kaman used to build that kind of chopper back in the 50’s and 60’s. What ever became of that design?


8 posted on 03/06/2011 10:55:08 PM PST by beelzepug ("Don't be a wise guy, Eddie.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"...icy helipad on a 21,000-foot ledge..."

Wow! 600 kilos at that altitude is impressive .......................... FRegards

9 posted on 03/06/2011 11:03:19 PM PST by gonzo ( Buy more ammo, dammit! You should already have the firearms .................. FRegards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Nice bird. Purpose built and so far, well done.

I wonder how it and the CH-53 Super Stallion compare at these weights/altitudes?
10 posted on 03/07/2011 12:35:23 AM PST by Tainan (Cogito Ergo Conservitus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

informative article, thanks!


11 posted on 03/07/2011 1:26:17 AM PST by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

informative article, thanks!


12 posted on 03/07/2011 1:26:23 AM PST by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

The CH-53’s service ceiling is typically about 20,400 feet, and the typical load is around 17,000lb (though no doubt that’s reduced at such an altitude). It also has 50% more engine and way more rotor surface. However, the ‘53 is HUGE compared to this thing (or most any other helicopter, really), and might not even be able to land at Siachen.


13 posted on 03/07/2011 1:34:56 AM PST by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson