Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flowerplough

There is no “right to marry” in the Constitution.

Evolution is only possible with heterosexual relationships.

A phantasmagorical fetish of homosexual monogamy is religious faggotry.

I don’t want that in the law either...


38 posted on 03/06/2011 7:01:11 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Francis Dashwood

“There is no “right to marry” in the Constitution.”

Nor is there a right to work. Marriage is a tribal, folk custom approved and co-opted first by religions and later by government. I can see allowing the various religions to set their own standards for marriages they endorse, but I can’t see our government holding the non-believers to what’s in the Torah or Koran.


48 posted on 03/07/2011 5:06:06 AM PST by flowerplough (Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson