Posted on 03/05/2011 12:13:27 AM PST by free me
Christie is not more conservative than Daniels, and arguably even less so. Christie told the Newark Star-Ledger that while personally pro-life, he won’t use his office to “shove that down people’s throats.” He supports New Jersey’s restrictive gun laws. And like Daniels, he has decided it’s tough enough to face his public-sector unions that he does not need to start an unrelated fight over right-to-work with private-sector unions. Yet the most acid-tongued of all right-wing commentators, Ann Coulter, has championed a Christie candidacy, asserting that if he declines to run, “Romney will be our nominee and we’ll lose.”
(Excerpt) Read more at frumforum.com ...
How about none of the above.
Ditto on that.
Christie has said repeatedly he will not run for president. If one believes him on his performance to date, one has to believe his intention not to run, regardless of Coulter’s wishes. And no, I do not support Rommney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.