[freedomwarrior998]

Argumentum Ad Hominem is not a valid method of debunking any claims or charges made.

[Moseley]

Argumentum Ad Hominem is not a valid method of debunking any claims or charges made.

If someone could not know what they claim to know, then it is absolute proof of the falsehood of those claims.

David Keegan insinuates that he would KNOW about thefinances of the campaign by virtue of being a Finance Consultant.

Small problem: He was NOT a Finance Consultant.

So, how would he know about Christine O'Donnell's personal finances or the finances of the campaign?

If I claim that Bill Clinton robbed a liquor store in Chicago -- but I was in Paris at the time -- it would affect the credibility of my claim, don't you agree?