To: lormand
“All pirates should be shot at sea. PERIOD!”
That would be a waste of ammunition. A rope tied to an anchor would be sufficient.
To: forgotten man
That would be a waste of ammunition. A rope tied to an anchor would be sufficient.Anchors are MUCH more costly than bullets! But the rope is pretty cheap- and reusable! Hang 'em.
28 posted on
02/24/2011 10:01:39 AM PST by
JimRed
(Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: forgotten man
That would be a waste of ammunition. A rope tied to an anchor would be sufficient.Anchors are MUCH more costly than bullets! But the rope is pretty cheap- and reusable! Hang 'em.
29 posted on
02/24/2011 10:01:55 AM PST by
JimRed
(Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: forgotten man
“All pirates should be shot at sea. PERIOD!”
That would be a waste of ammunition. A rope tied to an anchor would be sufficient.
Bullets are cheaper than anchors!
45 posted on
02/24/2011 10:27:16 AM PST by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: forgotten man
When you consider that our brave practice with live rounds at sea, why not procure the expense of a few fiddy cal bursts on pirates and vessel(s) as the same? In that context, it would not be wasting anything at all and nullifies the risk of one of our boys getting hurt by getting too close to these feral beasts. Why just the Navy? Don't our AC-130 crews need practice too?
53 posted on
02/24/2011 10:50:10 AM PST by
lormand
(A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson