Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Rebuke Effort to Defund Health Care Law (Here they go again! Defund it NOW!)
Fox News ^ | 2/15/2011 | Chad Pergram |

Posted on 02/15/2011 4:06:52 AM PST by tobyhill

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and defenders of the health care reform law unearthed an unexpected and temporary ally Monday night: Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC).

Politics makes strange bedfellows. But few bunking arrangements are stranger than this.

To be clear, there aren't many in Congress who have more antipathy for the health care law than Foxx. In fact, at a meeting of the House Rules Committee Monday night, Foxx could barely hide her contempt for the health law.

"It is an abomination that this bill was passed," scoffed Foxx.

But for a few moments, Foxx, and all seven of her Republican colleagues on the Rules Committee formed a short-term vanguard to preserve the touchstone of the Democrats' legislative agenda last year.

Here's what's going on:

On Tuesday, the House plans to debate a bill to fund the government through September. Republicans aim to use the measure to pare at least $100 billion in spending out of this year's budget.

There is no provision more onerous to conservatives than the health law. So if the GOP is set to cut spending, why not shave the money set aside to implement the health law, too?

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) planned to do just that, which would in turn cripple all government operations devoted to executing the health law. In other words, if there's no money, the government can't carry out the policy.

And that's when King ran into a buzz saw run by Virginia Foxx and the rest of the Republicans on the House Rules Committee.

All of those Republicans want to upend the health care law just as much as King does. But not at the expense of corrupting House rules that govern how to handle the spending measure on the floor.

(Excerpt) Read more at politics.blogs.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
These same RINOs seem to have forgotten that the Rats didn't pass the law by usual congressional means so, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
1 posted on 02/15/2011 4:06:55 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The Republicans were given the majority in the House specifically to repeal Obamacare.

They would do well to not lose sight of that fact.


2 posted on 02/15/2011 4:16:59 AM PST by Arm_Bears (I'll have what the gentleman on the floor is drinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Democrats use the rules to get whatever they want.

Republicans use the rules to protect whatever the Democrats want.

Same stuff, different day.


3 posted on 02/15/2011 4:18:33 AM PST by EternalVigilance (The steering wheel is irrelevent once you've gone off the cliff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
These same RINOs seem to have forgotten that the Rats didn't pass the law by usual congressional means so, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Two wrongs don't make a right.

4 posted on 02/15/2011 4:20:39 AM PST by CarmichaelPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

So they are afraid to bend the rules for a law the Dems were ready to ‘deem passed’? Figures. And they wonder why they keep losing elections.


5 posted on 02/15/2011 4:21:23 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
We were bamboozled again by the GOP. It's way past time for Conservatives to ditch the GOP.
6 posted on 02/15/2011 4:22:57 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CarmichaelPatriot

Says who?


7 posted on 02/15/2011 4:23:35 AM PST by beandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CarmichaelPatriot

If they change the rules before they vote then it’s not breaking the rules.
This is a shell game with the GOP hiding behind the same rules they could change.


8 posted on 02/15/2011 4:26:11 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sheana

It’s not even bending the rules since they have the numbers to change the rules first.


9 posted on 02/15/2011 4:27:19 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

What do you mean it wasn’t passed by usual means?


10 posted on 02/15/2011 4:34:12 AM PST by RightFighter (Now back to my war station.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
It is highly unlikely that this 112th congress will defund appropriations for this monstrosity.

The time being taken is the time required for the new house to understand the power that landed on their lap like a hot little bitch, ready to go.

Power is never relinquished without outright violence or imminent recognizable viability of such projection. Never. Ever.

Ask Mubarak.

11 posted on 02/15/2011 4:35:16 AM PST by mmercier ( been going on for a long time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
The Senate bypassed the legislative process because it could be filibustered but they passed it using a budgetary process which is why they fudged the CBO numbers.
12 posted on 02/15/2011 4:37:17 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Throw them out.


13 posted on 02/15/2011 4:38:36 AM PST by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

That’s right. The rules are whatever the Republicans say they are.

And whatever the House rules are, they ain’t Holy Writ.

The Democrats play this game with bayonets. The Republicans use spaghetti noodles.


14 posted on 02/15/2011 4:38:44 AM PST by EternalVigilance (The steering wheel is irrelevent once you've gone off the cliff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

These are the Republican House Rules Committee members:

http://rules.house.gov/singlepages.aspx?NewsID=3&RSBD=4

David Dreier, CA Chairman
Pete Sessions, TX Vice-Chairman
Virginia Foxx, NC
Rob Bishop, UT
Rob Woodall, GA
Richard Nugent, FL
Tim Scott, SC
Daniel Webster, FL

How much pull would the chairman have in this? I don’t trust him simply because he’s a member of this merry band of RINOs:

http://www.republicanmainstreet.org/index.php/ElectedMembers


15 posted on 02/15/2011 4:42:06 AM PST by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

They will find a lot of anger for these shenanigans. A lot.

Just what the hell are they thinking?

I’m getting on the phone dammit.


16 posted on 02/15/2011 4:44:53 AM PST by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Part of me is like....

Oh my here we go with this ....”We’re taking the high road,” junk again. We’re Republicans and we play by the rules....

if it was such faux integrity ....

A Nation of Laws is what we’re supposed to be. The Courts have ruled this healthcare monstrosity unConstitutional.

If it is unConstitutional then it can’t be funded.

That should be our emails, faxes etc. to those members of the rules committee.


17 posted on 02/15/2011 4:47:55 AM PST by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Heck...can it even be in the budget bill to begin with at this point?


18 posted on 02/15/2011 4:49:31 AM PST by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

...and the criminal democrat party laughs at the unbounded stupidity demonstrated by the “opposition” to socialized medicine.

I must take some action here. There will be a ton of phone calls made today. A ton.


19 posted on 02/15/2011 4:53:09 AM PST by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
RE :"All of those Republicans want to upend the health care law just as much as King does. But not at the expense of corrupting House rules that govern how to handle the spending measure on the floor."

What does this mean? Is there some principle here?

20 posted on 02/15/2011 5:05:27 AM PST by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson