Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/14/2011 11:26:53 AM PST by Oakeshott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oakeshott

what is the likely outcome in regards to America? I know obamanation is not interested in this, but I am.


2 posted on 02/14/2011 11:30:09 AM PST by bareford101 (. All Muslims lie to infidels to confuse them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

I’d prefer an alternative Ulster.


3 posted on 02/14/2011 11:31:39 AM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

Intersting, but that would be a lot of loading and unloading
of freight containers.


4 posted on 02/14/2011 11:32:30 AM PST by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

There once was a proposal to build a canal across Nicaragua........


5 posted on 02/14/2011 11:33:05 AM PST by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name. Want to have fun? Google your friend's names.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

It’s called a portage. They did it in ancient Corinth. Unload, transport, reload.


7 posted on 02/14/2011 11:36:09 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott
Guess that would work:


10 posted on 02/14/2011 11:40:31 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

It should be the US negotiating to build the canal, not China.


12 posted on 02/14/2011 11:42:27 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott; All

No wonder why the Free Trade Communists were pushing a US Free Trade deal with Colombia....they are in cahoots with Communist China!

Wonder if this means the USA gets back the Panama Canal from the Communist Chinese? Knowing the Free Trade Communists....they would let the Communist Chinese keep it


14 posted on 02/14/2011 11:43:37 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Newt Gingrich and Chris Matthews: Seperated at Birth??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

The proposed dry canal is called “break bulk” - and the practice was largely phased out 100 years ago due to high labor costs - the reason ships are attractive is the efficiency of labor and fuel once all is loaded. The most expensive parts are the loading and unloading. Add one more cycle of loading/unloading and you may as well just go around the long way.


16 posted on 02/14/2011 11:45:04 AM PST by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

Columbia is not the most peaceful of places.... this scheme can’t work unless the tracks were absolutely secure; and I can see rebels targeting the tracks and the trains on them.


18 posted on 02/14/2011 11:47:48 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

I doubt that this will happen. Too much time loading and unloading and the idea that they would load another ship immediately on the other side is not a real possibility.


20 posted on 02/14/2011 11:48:32 AM PST by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott
1999 As you know, this year the United States turns the Panama Canal over to Panama. Well, this morning's Investor's Business Daily reports that Panama has contracted the management of the Canal out to a Hong Kong firm "with close ties to the Chinese government."

The implications of this management deal should be obvious. In case of war, it will greatly hamper the ability of the US Navy to get ships from one ocean to another quickly.

Couple this with the fact that China now has a military base on the US mainland. A couple of years ago, the Clinton administration sold the Long Beach Naval Air Station to the China Overseas Shipping Company (COSCO). COSCO is using the facility as a port, but anybody who thinks that the Chinese military isn't ready to make the fullest possible use of the base at a moment's notice is living in a fantasy world.End snip

So now the 'Independent' closet leftist Santos is ready to hand Colombia to China on a silver platter. Precious.

24 posted on 02/14/2011 11:58:49 AM PST by Calusa (The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles. Quoth Bob Dylan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott
1999 As you know, this year the United States turns the Panama Canal over to Panama. Well, this morning's Investor's Business Daily reports that Panama has contracted the management of the Canal out to a Hong Kong firm "with close ties to the Chinese government."

The implications of this management deal should be obvious. In case of war, it will greatly hamper the ability of the US Navy to get ships from one ocean to another quickly.

Couple this with the fact that China now has a military base on the US mainland. A couple of years ago, the Clinton administration sold the Long Beach Naval Air Station to the China Overseas Shipping Company (COSCO). COSCO is using the facility as a port, but anybody who thinks that the Chinese military isn't ready to make the fullest possible use of the base at a moment's notice is living in a fantasy world.End snip

So now the 'Independent' closet leftist Santos is ready to hand Colombia over to China on a silver platter. Precious.

25 posted on 02/14/2011 12:00:15 PM PST by Calusa (The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles. Quoth Bob Dylan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

One more thought. We have had such an arrangement for a long time. Rather than a canal it is called a land bridge.


29 posted on 02/14/2011 12:05:11 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott
Reportedly, the Atlantic port is to be built near Cartagena.

660 miles according to Bing. With a stop in Medellin, no doubt, to pay special taxes and/or pick up special cargo.

Doesn't look very promising.

30 posted on 02/14/2011 12:09:10 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

Long before this is finished the Panama Canal Expansion Project will be done. The canal will then be able to handle ships up to 1800 feet long and 180 feet wide with a draft of 60 feet. That’s going to kill any advantage the overland route may have.


48 posted on 02/14/2011 2:32:39 PM PST by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

Aren’t they (whomever they are) expanding the Panama Canal as we speak?

Thought I saw or read where they are doing so.


49 posted on 02/14/2011 2:38:02 PM PST by Fledermaus (WAKE UP! Get rid of the LIBS in the GOP. If not us, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

Anything that keeps the Panama Canal operators from raising rates is a very good thing.


57 posted on 02/14/2011 5:31:06 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oakeshott

Will MSNBC send Chris Matthews to Egypt to cover this story?


59 posted on 02/15/2011 6:25:39 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson