Wouldn't be nice if nobody showed
1 posted on
02/10/2011 8:24:15 AM PST by
Nachum
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
2 posted on
02/10/2011 8:25:08 AM PST by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
The White House did not respond to inquiries from CNSNews.com about these “invitation only” and “listen only” conference calls for news media sponsored by the first lady's office. Don't you get it CNSNews? No questions. Ever.
3 posted on
02/10/2011 8:26:50 AM PST by
DManA
To: Nachum; kristinn
Any “reporter” who calls in for this travesty has outed themself as a stooge.
4 posted on
02/10/2011 8:28:16 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
To: Nachum
Thou shall not Question thy Betters.
5 posted on
02/10/2011 8:32:19 AM PST by
null and void
(We are now in day 751 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: Nachum
How sad, what journalism schools have churned out for the past 30 years?
7 posted on
02/10/2011 8:37:58 AM PST by
blackdog
To: Nachum
Translation: Her Highness Holds "STFU, I'M Talkin" and "Bootlickers Only" Conference Calls for Obamite Propagandists.
8 posted on
02/10/2011 8:42:17 AM PST by
WayneS
(Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
To: Nachum
The White House did not respond to inquiries What didn't they understand about the "listen only" part?
9 posted on
02/10/2011 8:42:48 AM PST by
twhitak
To: Nachum
You VILL knot ask ANY awkward questions of zee furst Wookie!
10 posted on
02/10/2011 8:46:24 AM PST by
Let's Roll
(Save the world's best healthcare - REPEAL, DEFUND Obamacare!)
To: Nachum
What’s not clear in the story is whether reporters knew ahead of time that they would be passive attendees. A “listen only” session shouldn’t necessarily preempt a (low-level) reporter from attending, but no reporter worth his salt would subject himself to this crap treatment if they were led to believe that it would be a participatory session.
11 posted on
02/10/2011 8:49:43 AM PST by
rockrr
("I said that I was scared of you!" - pokie the pretend cowboy)
To: Nachum
Mark Levin was saying the other night that Hillary had gotten in trouble in the past on something called “open meetings” problem. Anybody else hear that, and know more? Thanks
12 posted on
02/10/2011 8:50:25 AM PST by
Sybeck1
(Memo to Mitt Romney: Just go away.............)
To: Nachum
Michelle Antoinette is at it again! Can’t be troubled by the riff-raff.
13 posted on
02/10/2011 8:50:30 AM PST by
2nd Bn, 11th Mar
(The "p" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
To: Nachum
Who drew the short straws to get that assignment?
14 posted on
02/10/2011 8:53:14 AM PST by
AU72
To: Nachum
Could you imagine if Laura or Barbara Bush tried something like this? There would be outrage and a mass boycott by the MSM. More hypocrisy.
15 posted on
02/10/2011 8:55:04 AM PST by
Spok
("What are you going to believe; me or your own eyes?" -Groucho Marx)
To: Nachum
Could you imagine if Laura or Barbara Bush tried something like this? There would be outrage and a mass boycott by the MSM. More hypocrisy.
16 posted on
02/10/2011 8:55:20 AM PST by
Spok
("What are you going to believe; me or your own eyes?" -Groucho Marx)
To: Nachum
Somebody explain to me how this isn’t propaganda. Leni Riefenstahl would be so proud.
To: Nachum
Let them eat.. Okra! (/Moochelle)
20 posted on
02/10/2011 10:00:59 AM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson