Christine O'Donnell Establishes 'ChristinePAC,' Plans to 'Bring the Battle' to Her Opponents

ABC News ^ | February 8, 2011 | THE NOTE (Gregory Simmons)

[mountainbunny]

Her beliefs were and are 100% Conservative, and she was viciously attacked by neocons.

How about her actions? Anyone can say anything. Her actions seem to say that she doesn't care about paying her bills or working hard. Her actions seem to say that she thrives on media attention.

How is pointing that out a "vicious" attack?

[guinnessman]

No pictures?

[DallasSun]

lol...THAT was funny!

[truthfreedom]

I wasn’t referring to your answer when I was talking about vicious attacks? Yours were part of a whole picture.

[truthfreedom]

But I get from your response that you agree that neocons aren’t Conservative, they do want to destroy Conservatives through personal attacks, but you don’t think their attacks would be called vicious, perhaps justified.

Yes, when you don’t like somebody, when you want to hurt them, you can attack them. I’m just pointing out the neocons don’t like conservatives and want to hurt them. And they don’t argue about policy, because they would reveal themselves as being unconservative. So they attack her personally.

The Conservative (Christine) was attacked by the enemy (the neocons fairly. I shouldn’t have said that the neocon enemy was vicious. But the behavior of the neocons toward the conservative was the behavior of one enemy to another.

[upsdriver]

To those of you who feel the need to dismiss, ridicule or otherwise demean Christine O’Donnell; why don’t you get the hell off your fat asses and do something? At least she is engaged in the battle. It’s so damned easy to sit on the internet and anonymously post criticisms but it solves nothing. You’re worse than liberals.

[gusty]

I am afraid she is our version of Al Sharpton. She is going to use politics as a way of supporting herself financially. Lets not kid ourselves, she was not a good candidate. She doesn’t kid herself, the last thing she expects is to actually win. This way she can support herself without having to actually work for a living, like Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

[Moseley]

I am afraid she is our version of Al Sharpton. She is going to use politics as a way of supporting herself financially

What the hell does that mean? If someone works, even in politics, why should they not be paid for their work? Right here on Free Republic we see constant appeals for donations. What kind of work do you think is acceptable? Most people in politics work a lot harder than you do.

[Moseley]

I LIKED her, but now have questions. Mostly because I have heard that she used the campaign funds she raised last cycle for personal bills. I don’t know the truth of it.

IF you don't know the truth of it, why are you listening to it? Do you really expect the liberal media to tell the truth? THINK! What does the media tell you about Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, John Boehner, Mike Pence, Ron Paul, and even Ronald Reagan?

You should be ashamed to call yourself a conservative if you imagine that the news media is telling the truth about conservatives. Where have you been all these years?

[wardaddy]

I gave a lot of money to her.

She means well but she is not surefooted enough.

[Moseley]

She could fire herself, then sue herself for $6 million, and then settle!

She would have to break the law. The Inter-Collegiate Studies Institute broke the law, and people there should have gone to jail. I know. I was the lawyer who wrote Christine O'Donnell's lawsuit. I examined the evidence. I still have the evidence of ISI's unquestioned guilt. By the way, ISI never actually denied it. Because we were searching for a lawyer licensed in Delaware when a deadline was running out, Christine filed my draft over her signature, as I am not a lawyer licensed in Delaware.

[NTHockey]

>>Mostly because I have heard that she used the campaign funds she raised last cycle for personal bills.<<

What you have “heard” is what the media wants you to hear. She is being sued, by Biden operatives and the GOP RINOs, because she used campaign funds to pay rent on a townhouse she “claims” was a campaign headquarters.

I’ve been inside and a)it is not the lavish palace as portrayed and b) it was most definitely a campaign HQ. She didn’t use GOP facilities, because THEY REFUSED TO LET HER. When she opened two campaign offices after the primary, the RINOs rushed to support local candidates and plastered Castle for Senate signs all over the place.

Please be a little more selective in believing what you hear.

[MichaelCorleone]

“Based on their reaction to her, I count her as an ally and someone worthy of my support, even if I don’t know anything else about her.”

I’m with you 100%.

[MichaelCorleone]

That needed to be stated. Thanks.

[runninglips]

Please be a little more selective in believing what you hear.

I don't know if your comment was supposed to be funny or you are unintentionally a comic. I can only hear what is presented. I have not heard a commentator give a positive report on her situation, but would be open to hearing it. The only talk show that brought it up was M. Medved. He HATES her with a passion, and I hate him above all "conservative" talkers.(I listen because he is on at noon, the alternative is the comic). The gist of the argument is that she raised huge money, and spent like a pauper. She either banked the money, or spent it on herself instead of getting her message out. I could easily be persuaded if there was any other message out there. There is not one, not even a long thread about it on this forum.

[runninglips]

How can I hear the truth of the situation, if O’Donnell does not present a defense. I have not heard Rush, Beck, Medved or Levin bring forth a defense at all. The MSM has really not covered her except to report any allegations. THERE IS NO IN DEPTH ANALYSIS. If you know of any, please point me to it.

[Moseley]

O’Donnell has presented a defense. So what does that say about YOUR research skills, intelligence, and political awareness, that you don’t know what it is?

You can drag a fool to facts, but you can’t make him think.

[Moseley]

I have not heard a commentator give a positive report on her situation, but would be open to hearing it.

We have all heard it... so you must be pretty stupid, eh? On December 30, CHristine was on *ALL* the morning news shows discussing this: ALL OF THEM: ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox News, CNN.

So what does that say about your awareness of the news? If you watched *ANY* channel you would have heard her explain the whole thing.

So once again we see that Christine is smarter than her critics. EVERY SINGLE TIME.

[Moseley]

She either banked the money, or spent it on herself instead of getting her message out

That is a damnable lie and really, really stupid to boot.

The only money that was "banked" was REQUIRED because the Delaware Republican Party filed an FEC complaint challenging the Tea Party Express' independent expenditure of $500,000. This forced O'Donnell's campaign to take $500,000 off the table, plus legal fees, to defend against the Delaware Republican Party's attack on her AND THE TEA PARTY.

Were you in Delaware watching the TV commercials? I was. What the hell are you talking about? Those in Delaware so the TV commercials on MASSIVELY EXPENSIVE Philadelphia TV stations -- the only TV stations that reach Delaware.

Thank you for proving once again that Christine's critics are not intellectually tall enough to criticize her.

[NTHockey]

I’m neither a comic nor particularly funny. My point is if you listen to those that blast her (Rove, Medved, Krauthammer, etc.), it will bias your opinion against her.

Much has been made of her fund raising and her campaign spending, much of it distorted (intentionally). She ran her primary against Castle on the cheap - no lit drops, volunteers doing the polling, etc. - and ran up some bills for HQ rent and phone bills.

After the primary, DE GOP Party fought against her, National Party gave her a pittance, and she was sued by a Biden operative in cohoots with Tom Ross. She didn’t start raising big money until two weeks before the general election. By then, all the TV and radio time was bought up. She had to rely on invites on radio and a local cable access channel (who “lost” the tape, twice!) The rest of her campaign funds remain in escrow for legal battles.

Now consider this, 18% of DE PUBs voted for the Marxist, Coons, rather than try to win.