Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Full Headline:

Kagan, Sotomayor blew chance to stop eligibility challenge?

Lawyers say Supremes broke rule, failed to respond to recusal motion

1 posted on 01/26/2011 4:24:19 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Smokeyblue

They probably do not want to get mixed up in it unless forced to.


2 posted on 01/26/2011 4:26:19 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Smokeyblue

I really think he WANTS to start something over this. It’s too convenient that all of his most ardent supporters (Abercrombie et al) are suddenly “stepping in it”.


4 posted on 01/26/2011 4:48:27 AM PST by Mygirlsmom (We had it wrong the whole time. Khrushchev actually said, "We will Barry you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Smokeyblue

The court challenges seem to be against the wrong people. Shouldn’t the court cases be brought against the specific individuals who participated in the fraud? The courts will always be reticent to rule against Obama’s eligibility, since that is constitutionally given to congress. If the fraud was uncovered in the court system, then it would emboldened hearings in the house. Who (besides Obama) lied under oath and who has standing to bring a civil suit against them?


10 posted on 01/26/2011 6:30:30 AM PST by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Smokeyblue

11 posted on 01/26/2011 6:31:05 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Smokeyblue
...and possibly requiring a new conference vote among the seven remaining justices, including four mostly conservative, on whether the high court will hear arguments over Obama's legitimacy.

It didn't make it past the last coference vote if memory serves, it won't make it past another one. Recusing Kagan and Sotomayor would accomplish nothing. The full court takes up a case if only four of the nine justices vote to consider it; it doesn't take a majority. If there were not four votes to hear Hollister before all this then there won't be four votes after it.

17 posted on 01/26/2011 9:51:57 AM PST by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Smokeyblue

Full Headline:
Kagan, Sotomayor blew chance to stop eligibility challenge?

Lawyers say Supremes broke rule, failed to respond to recusal motion


Any single Supreme Court Justice can request that the defendant (Obama) file a response to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (request for the Court to hear an appeal). If a Justice asks, the Government MUST respond.

In Kerchner v Obama, the government (acting for Obama) did not voluntarily file a response to Kerchner’s petition and none of the nine Justices asked for a response.

That means that NO Justice was contemplating granting this petition. Sotomayor and Kagan were therefore irrelevant.


18 posted on 01/26/2011 11:42:19 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson