To: KeyLargo
Basically, judges are getting pissed that it’s getting harder for them to lie to juries about what the law is.
2 posted on
01/17/2011 5:13:20 AM PST by
jdege
To: jdege
Not sure its the law the judge wants people ignorant about but rather evidence. Something gets suppressed thats crucial over a technicality and they’re afraid a juror will find out. They hate when people know all the facts.
6 posted on
01/17/2011 5:23:14 AM PST by
wiggen
(The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
To: jdege
The lawyers are pissed too because trials could start being about the facts and not the strategies and showmanship of the legal teams.
7 posted on
01/17/2011 5:25:05 AM PST by
Bryanw92
(We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
To: jdege
"Basically, judges are getting pissed that it’s getting harder for them to lie to juries about what the law is." This will be remedied by the Obama regime.
8 posted on
01/17/2011 5:27:41 AM PST by
KeyLargo
To: jdege
18 posted on
01/17/2011 6:00:17 AM PST by
Ann Archy
(Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: jdege
Basically, judges are getting pissed that it’s getting harder for them to lie to juries about what the law is. No, it's getting harder for judges to insure that juries are not influenced by inadmissable evidence. How you feel if you were one of the Duke defendants and the case had gone to trial and you knew the jurors were googling the New York Times' and Rayleigh Observor's coverage of the case?
19 posted on
01/17/2011 6:06:22 AM PST by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
To: jdege
criminal trials are supposed to be unfair.
They are unfair to the prosecutors. Jurries are not supposed to be impartial.
31 posted on
01/17/2011 8:17:57 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson