There's nothing wrong with charging a moderate posting privilidge.
It would actually cut down on the trolls ~ look at the difference in posts on the Wall Street Journal, compared to posts on Market Watch, which WSJ owns and doesn't charge for. MW is a pump n dump, anonymous Lib hypster infested pit, while you have to use your own name on the WSJ.
I'm not up for giving away the freedom FR's anonymity offers, (though the Rats will find us if they want to, no matter what) but a dollar a day ~ or a two tier system for those who are occasional visitors or just don't use much bandwith wouldn't chase anyone away.
Or just don't extend the benefit of having a unique ID to anyone who doesn't donate.
If we don't value the community you've attracted and provided for, why should the community offer us notoriety?
Visitors could still do their DD on most any currently relevant subject for free, an offering clearly near to your heart.
Though I'm against banner ads, I would support a simple Business Listing section benefit for members who donate.
What an excellent idea. I hope Jim considers incorporating that into the site.