Posted on 01/07/2011 5:34:02 AM PST by LSUfan
Sometimes it's easier to shoot the messenger.
Former Reagan administration defense official Frank Gaffney is still waiting for somebody to rebut his allegations that the Muslim Brotherhood, which seeks to impose shariah law around the world, is running an influence operation in Washington, D.C. Instead, he's being called an anti-Muslim bigot.
After WND reported yesterday that Gaffney accused Muslim Republican Suhail Khan of "infiltrating" the Conservative Political Action Conference on behalf of radical Islamists, Khan and CPAC director Lisa DePasquale fired back with personal attacks on Gaffney in Salon and Politico.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
CSP now of course being accused of bigotry. (These so-called "conservatives" have chosen those conservative media Salon and Politico for their ad hominem attacks.)
The article that started it was entitled:
Now look who else is infiltrating CPAC
Last night, a follow-up was published:
The problem for CPAC, Suhail Khan and Grover Norquist, and the Muslim Brotherhood is that their ties have been documented for years:
Here is Khan's dossier at Discover the Networks:
He and his family have longstanding ties to Wahhabi Muslim Brotherhood groups such as the Muslim Students Association, CAIR and ISNA, all unindicted co-conspirators in the largest terrorism financing trial in US history, the US v. Holy Land Foundation.
More on CPAC's Khan here:
Then we come to Grover Norquist. His financial ties to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and convicted Jihadist terrorists, such as Abdurahman Alamoudi and Sami Al-Arian have been documented for years and years:
Why is being against people whose goal is to kill us all, “hysteria”?
What is it, like, 400 times that “kill the infidel” is written in the Koran?
> Why is being against people whose goal is to kill us all, “hysteria”?
Because Mohammedanism has been deemed by the Left as one of their politically correct protectorate.
They are, of course, irrational in light of such things as this.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
Ah, you may view the Left as inconsistent and irrational,
but that is only the case if you believe what they say openly.
They are not anti-religion. They are anti-Christian.
Supporting Islam is entirely consistent.
But Khan and Norquist CLAIM to be conservative. The acknowledged Left isn’t even involved in this, though it is apparent that Norquist is no Reagan conservative...
It’s not hysteria. It’s the Left following a script. All muslims are poor and oppressed, therefore any criticism of a muslim is hysteria and racism. Same script the Left always uses.
How about discussing facts, instead of the irrational emotionalism the Left always uses to get its way?
But let someone be concerned about the stated goals and predispositions of muslims, and it's "put a sock in his mouth.
Infideliphobia from totalitarian deceivers.
Life, liberty and the pursuit and destruction of totalitarians.
islam is an evil cult of opression murder and terror with the sole purpose of destroying western civilization.
We must stand and fight against it at every turn.
mooslims are blood-soaked cromagnons. They do not belong in civilized society. They want to kill you and your children. They take great joy in creating blobs of bloody protoplasm from infidels. They would be pleased to put you head in a vise and slowly close it. It would make their day to hear the cracking and your screaming. Have a nice day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.