Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State plan gives some services to cities, counties {Jerry Brown's secret plan}
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 1/5/11 | Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau

Posted on 01/05/2011 7:42:43 AM PST by SmithL

Sacramento -- As California faces a budget deficit that could top $28 billion over the next 18 months, Gov. Jerry Brown and other state leaders are poised to shift the responsibility for providing some services from the state to counties and cities.

In one of his first meetings as governor, Brown spoke with county leaders Tuesday about significantly restructuring government. He also attempted to allay the fears of some local officials that the state could pass off duties without providing sufficient means to pay for them.

"We're going to shift funding to the local level, we're going to make sure there's enough responsibility and discretion to use the money in the wisest possible ways," Brown told reporters after the meeting, adding that he does not believe it will be an easy change. "There will be controversies."

Brown did not publicly lay out a specific plan, but said he is considering changing the way foster care, welfare, food stamps, redevelopment, and parole and probation services are provided to the public.

Brown's campaign plan

The restructuring is the underpinning of Brown's campaign promise to move the responsibility for delivery and funding of government services closer to the people instead of keeping it concentrated in Sacramento.

The meeting at the headquarters of the California State Association of Counties was met with praise from that organization's leaders, who said they believe counties and local government agencies can provide the same services more efficiently than a statewide bureaucracy.

Money must be there

Chief among the concerns of locals, though, is that the state would hand over responsibility without sufficient resources to pay for them. County officials have in the past complained that that's what happened when the state gave them oversight of In-Home Supportive Services for the elderly and the disabled.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bohica; goldenstate; moonbeam; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Chief among the concerns of locals, though, is that the state would hand over responsibility without sufficient resources to pay for them.
Gee, I wonder why they'd think that?

Again

1 posted on 01/05/2011 7:42:48 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I guess Moonbeam is going to pay for it out of his own pocket....


2 posted on 01/05/2011 7:44:17 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

It’s like watching a WWII newsreal of some Kamikazee plane taking flak and spirling into the ocean. You know tere’s a living human inside that thing, but you still enjoy seeing them auger in.


3 posted on 01/05/2011 7:50:26 AM PST by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

move the responsibility to others, keep the money. Make people pay more to someone else.

Browns plan.


4 posted on 01/05/2011 7:50:39 AM PST by edcoil (Democrat's and vampires should never be invited in your home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown

spiraling and there’s
typos starting early today.


5 posted on 01/05/2011 7:51:34 AM PST by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

His magic unicorn will just crap skittles and T-bills... LOL


6 posted on 01/05/2011 7:51:46 AM PST by Nat Turner (I can see NOVEMBER from my house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“Unfunded mandates”

A page from the FedGov’s fav playbook.


7 posted on 01/05/2011 7:52:17 AM PST by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
He also attempted to allay the fears of some local officials that the state could pass off duties without providing sufficient means to pay for them.

Ha ha ha haaaaaa!

C'mon, Daddy-O, you can trust me.

8 posted on 01/05/2011 7:52:22 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
LOL. Notice Brown and the writer both collaborate to ignore the 800 lb budget gorilla in the room.

Unless he plans a sneak attack on public employee unions he has already failed.

9 posted on 01/05/2011 7:52:37 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"We're going to shift funding to the local level, we're going to make sure there's enough responsibility and discretion to use the money in the wisest possible ways," "There will be controversies."

I predict the Brown-outs will begin in March.

Mark this date and time. I was the first to call it.

10 posted on 01/05/2011 7:54:38 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"shift the responsibility for providing some services from the state to BANKRUPT counties and cities."
11 posted on 01/05/2011 7:54:41 AM PST by dynachrome ("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
This is great. “Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic” is usually a metaphor, but not this time. If the bankrupt State shifts responsibilities to bankrupt local governments, where does the fiscal buoyancy needed to keep the whole enterprise afloat come from, even if it happens?
12 posted on 01/05/2011 8:15:35 AM PST by Old North State (Don't blame me, I voted for Pedro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Then this bald headed stooge should should cut state taxes to make up for the localities having to (presumably) raise taxes pay for these new burdens

What Jerry Brown should really do to revive California’s economy is cut off all funding to the California Air Resources Board. Tell those idiots to go get hamburger flipper jobs. And get the Central Valley irrigation water turned on full blast.


13 posted on 01/05/2011 8:23:21 AM PST by dennisw (- - - -He who does not economize will have to agonize - - - - - Confucius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Just like states send most of their money to the Feds, so do counties send most of their money to the states. The round about needs to stop. Counties should keep their monies and watch the states scream.


14 posted on 01/05/2011 8:31:42 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Here come the local property tax elections.
15 posted on 01/05/2011 8:44:24 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Jerry Brown’s secret plan
City A has money take it and give it city B with no money.
Socialists never changes


16 posted on 01/05/2011 9:26:23 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson