Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/28/2010 12:38:40 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

http://www.nachumlist.com/obamaethics.htm


2 posted on 12/28/2010 12:39:45 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Lawyers- whoring for money. Nothing unusual here.

Seafood is okay. I'd eat it. Nothing but John Edwards type lawyers trying to exploit the situation.
3 posted on 12/28/2010 12:51:41 PM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

This is why, as a scientific expert, I will never give expert testimony in a lawsuit.

Scientific expert A, paid by the plaintiff attorneys, testifies about findings that are highly favorable to the plaintiff’s case.

Scientific expert B, paid by the defense attorneys, testifies about findings highly favorable to the defense.

At least one of those scientists is lying, just like the attorneys paying them. I could never put myself into such a position.


4 posted on 12/28/2010 12:59:41 PM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Of course it's safe to eat. It's just bigger now..................

5 posted on 12/28/2010 1:02:13 PM PST by Red Badger (Whenever these vermin call you an 'idiot', you can be sure that you are doing to something right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Ah me, SOS (same old “stuff”) from the trial lawyers and their eco-leftist allies. Fact 1) tests for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons are far more sensitive and specific than tests for aliphatic hydrocarbons. Fact 2) there CANNOT be aliphatic hydrocarbons present without the concomitant presence of aromatic hydrocarbons. Soooooo.....if they are finding aliphatic HC, and not aromatic, the source is other than the spill, probably from the same source as the “lynx hairs” that were found up near Washington state.


6 posted on 12/28/2010 1:10:38 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson