To: BillyBoy
The pro-Arnold freepers were warned that he was lying through his teeth and given amble evidence of his liberalism, they chose to ignore it Ridiculous! We did NOT want Cruz Bustamante. There was absolutely no way Tom McClintock was going to win. You have selective memory of the circumstances.
28 posted on
12/26/2010 5:45:54 PM PST by
BunnySlippers
(I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: BunnySlippers
Polls showed that if Arnold had dropped out and it had become a two-way race between Cruz Bustamante and Tom McClintock, McClintock would have won. It's ridiculous to think a majority of Ahnuld voters would have thrown their support to Bustamante. Furthermore, had the lying socialist Ahnuld lost the election to Bustamante, California would be in the exact same shape it's in now, except Democrats would rightfully get the blame and your state would have probably elected a decent Republican governor like most of the nation did in 2010.
Seems you're the one with selective memory
29 posted on
12/26/2010 5:51:42 PM PST by
BillyBoy
(Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
To: BunnySlippers; BillyBoy
Ridiculous! We did NOT want Cruz Bustamante. There was absolutely no way Tom McClintock was going to win. You have selective memory of the circumstances.
Here is the last USA Today/CNN/GALLUP poll before the recall.
"6. If the choice were between Cruz Bustamante, the Democrat and Tom McClintock, the Republican, who would you be more likely to vote for: Cruz Bustamante or Tom McClintock?"
September 25-27
Registered Voters
McClintock 49%
Bustamante 42%
Probable Voters
McClintock 56%
Bustamante 37%
32 posted on
12/26/2010 11:25:02 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson