In two years it will be so trashed out that the property will be UNSALEABLE, and illegal to rent.
No, the article clearly states, “The goal is that within seven years, each will have saved enough to buy a home.”
I would enjoy seeing a follow-up article 7 years from now including an evaluation of the building.
If it’s still standing...
“In two years it will be so trashed out that the property will be UNSALEABLE, and illegal to rent.”
I would have said less than two but either way that will be the outcome.
“In two years it will be so trashed out that the property will be UNSALEABLE, and illegal to rent.”
Beat me to it, and much better said.
Ref: Cabrini Green , Chicago et al.