Fodder for thought
To: surroundedbyblue
(but is really more of a moderate)
LOL, he’s a liberal!
2 posted on
12/19/2010 4:07:31 PM PST by
Cisco Nix
To: surroundedbyblue
There’s no penalty for knocking off a turncoat traitor like Specter. They use those guys up and throw them away.
Knocking off a sitting Democrat, son of a Democrat, would seem to be a different kettle of fish. I shouldn’t think the state party would be too happy about this.
3 posted on
12/19/2010 4:10:06 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: surroundedbyblue
He won’t have Christine O’Donnell to run against in ‘12.
4 posted on
12/19/2010 4:11:06 PM PST by
gusopol3
To: surroundedbyblue
Casey is a liberal who won on his fathers merits. The man is both ignorant and a liar.
8 posted on
12/19/2010 4:15:46 PM PST by
linn37
( "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
To: surroundedbyblue
Joe Sestak, who just barely lost against
disappointingly pro-homosexual Pat Toomey
There. Fixed it.
12 posted on
12/19/2010 4:39:57 PM PST by
ScottinVA
(The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
To: surroundedbyblue
Is Sestak pronounced Shestack?
13 posted on
12/19/2010 5:20:03 PM PST by
MIchaelTArchangel
(Obama makes me miss Jimmah Cahtah!)
To: surroundedbyblue
Issa has a lot of questions-subpoenaed and under oath--for Sestak first about the bribe Obama offered him to drop his challenge to Specter--felony criminal questions.
17 posted on
12/19/2010 6:12:25 PM PST by
Happy Rain
("Every Christmas the Leftist atheists become "hatetheists.")
To: surroundedbyblue
Casey has been a loyal(LIBERAL) Democrat. If Sestak challenges him he will receive NO support from Democrats in PA. Having said that, I HOPE he does run from the left against Casey. The MONEY spent would be drained from the GENERAL election against a Republican.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson