Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EQAndyBuzz
There is a charge on it for indigent expenses.

I haven’t been in a hospital for at least 15 years. But it is nice to know that they itemize the expense. It seems like a very honest way to tell the people what this government requirement is costing them. Much more honest than simply jacking up the price of every thing to cover the cost of providing care to freeloaders ($15 aspirins and the like)

But they are forced to do that by government regulations that say that any hospital that receives any government funding must provide life saving care regardless of ability to pay.

Personally I think hospitals should tell the government to take their money and go away but then I don’t run one. I have know idea how much money they get from the Fed.

But I have to believe that a hospital could provide services cheaper with out the government money and accompanying requirements

11 posted on 12/19/2010 7:04:35 AM PST by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Pontiac

Most hospitals could function well, make money and take care of the indigent by changing one policy. The amount of liability insurance they pay.

What should be regulated is litigation. The government can force executives to take a certain income, they could also force ambulance chasers to take 5% instead of one third.


15 posted on 12/19/2010 7:17:27 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Remember March 23, 1775. Remember March 23, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson