Replies

I think this rule, if implemented, would be stupid.

But all around the country, people are showering in open shower areas with homosexuals — most without their knowledge, I imagine. When I go to the gym, I don’t ask around to make sure there aren’t any gay people before I shower.

And of course, the guys in the military have been showering with the DADT gays for a while now. But it isn’t as disturbing when you don’t KNOW, I guess.

Funny how while some people have been working to try to figure out how to minimize the disruption caused by repeal, the real plan of the group seems to be to FORCE the disruption.

If I were black, I’d be pretty pissed at the argument made here. The whole point about racism being WRONG was that skin color is a MEANINGLESS DISTINCTION. But NOBODY can argue that sexual preference is MEANINGLESS. IF you threw a girl into the guy’s shower, most of the guys would be aroused, while they wouldn’t be with other guys.

Same with a homosexual, right? Isn’t that the whole reason we are being forced to do this, because homosexuals are, by their very nature, turned on by seeing naked men, and would be aroused by it, and attacted to the other men when seeing them naked?

In fact, it still seems to me that homosexuals should be kept out of the shower for THEIR OWN GOOD. They shouldn’t be unnecessarily aroused. In fact, repeal SHOULD have fixed THAT problem (while creating all the others). Before repeal, those homosexuals HAD to repress their homosexuality, and try not to get aroused in showers. But now they can just admit they are gay, and take showers separately.

(Note: You can’t have a “gay shower”, because that would be like putting dozens of self-attracted people together. That of course is the unnatural result of homosexuality: no way to divide into non-sexual groupings of greater than 2).