Not just accidents, but any number of murderous, violent crimes that have *NOTHING* to do with their homosexuality. Not a bit. No sir.
Because if the homosexual is beaten to death because of their perversion, the entire command will be punished, and likely there will be extra punishment for the murderer; instead, the homicide will be blamed on anything else.
And even the murderer will agree that getting the typical 3 years for homicide in the course of robbery is far better than 7 years because the victim was in a “protected class.”
Apparently, BTW, not “protected” enough.
The truly funny thing is that the big advocates of having homosexuals in the military do not care one bit if those homosexuals who are identified are murdered. In fact, the advocates are probably all in favor of homosexuals being murdered by soldiers, because the advocates can then call them “martyrs”.
Martyrs for the cause of forcing the homosexual agenda on others.
The bottom line is that many in our military are very capable in inflicting destruction and harm to the enemy. All the repeal of DADT will accomplish is for “the enemy” to be redefined.
“The enemy” will now be al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and homosexuals.
Pure evil and degeneracy have now taken hold of our military. No decent Christian or moral citizen should have anything to do with the institution. That it comes to this, as a lifetime supporter of the armed forces, makes my jaw drop. But that’s the reality of the times.
The” very large number” be damned, the political directive was handed down.
Just as perverse as some guy saying, “I won the election and so I do not have to qualify as prescribed by the Constitution”.
Perhaps the military now realizes the Lakin case was decided a few days too soon.
I guess they had better start letting men and women bunk and shower together too, then. Why not? I thought the point was to not have the distraction of being attracted to each other get in the way of living the Military life. I am heartbroken for straight men in our Military. They are the latest casualty in the Great Socialist Social Experiment.
Shitstorm in progress. Gates is a disgrace and should be run out on a rail!
SO much to say about this:
I would ask this....are heterosexual soldiers or marines required to shower, or share barracks with those who are naturally attracted to them, i.e. women? Of course not. In fact, it is not allowed because it is assumed that these men would be focused more on getting with the women than doing their jobs. But somehow, it’s okay ...in a voluntary military...to require men to share quarters with those who are attracted to men. Somehow, heterosexual men are stereotyped as unable to control themselves when seeing a naked woman....but we are to believe that homosexual men are above all that...they all know how to behave themselves in these situations. IN the meantime, we have Private Manning who traitorously uploads military secrets because he is upset about a love gone bad...and no one hears about it. BUt then....Obama wants to reduce the military anyway, so threats of people leaving don’t bother him in the least. Gives more money to his social programs
Gates, Texas A&M called. They want you to take their name off your resume.
PS-I hate ‘working groups’. They are nothing but a vehicle to give cover to and pretend to validate what ‘community organizers’ already want anyway.
I think every “yes” voter should get a rubber dildo in their stocking, and perhaps a male blow-up doll with back door entry. They’re a bunch of girly-men afraid to stand up for our military (but apparently not afraid to bend over for it). K-Y jellies all around!
Fags.
So can we assume there will not be separate facilities for men and women then? I don’t see any difference. (... and frankly I’d rather be watched in the shower by a hetero woman than some homo fag.)
Everything is backwards. Even our much-honored military has gone PC - at the top, anyway - and now we're willingly allowing openly homosexual people to enlist and we know that will be a disaster on many fronts, not the least of which will be a drop in enlistments. Pray for our country.
The military is the one thing that government can actually do well and now they have to screw it up.
It’s time for decent people to vacant the military and either force the government to ban homosexuals outright or reinstate a draft.
They said this with a straight face?
I’m sorry First Sergeant.
The dummy kept falling up the stairs and jumping off the roof. It was all we could do to stop him, her, it, whatever.
And who was this “wise man’s” group that drew such a conclusion? Who are these people and who appointed them? Cass Sunsteen? Van Jones? There is a strong odor of fish and bull feces about all this.
Names baby, we want names. And by their names we shall know their agenda. And then they can be blamed and shamed for the destruction of the finest military this planet has ever seen.
Anita Bryant was right!
What a tragedy.
Remember when homos said all they wanted was to quietly live their lives behind closed doors?
How many of the yes votes in congress are closet perverts themselves?
Everyone with a bit of sense knows the DOD survey is bogus - Obama told them what results he wanted and they started from the answer and filled in the question.
There will be a mass stampede of normal people leaving the military when their enlistments are up. I have empathy for those who really want to serve and those who are so far into their enlistmenst they can’t afford to walk out.
The gays will make a nice core for a SS type org. Immoral/Amoral. Weren’t the SS & SA leadership queer’d up?I’m sure they’ll get promoted faster than most. And as moral troops leave who’s watching the coop?
Also, I wonder if those who want to leave instead of re-upping will be allowed to leave, at least until their specialty or numbers can be filled?
Thirdly, what type of non-gay person will the armed forces attract? Military sheeple. This last aspect may be the most damaging of all. They’ll follow any order.
Submarines will be the worst.
And Fragging on a sub is tough to do.