Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Terpfen
Should have gone with the YF-23.

Why? Different material?

7 posted on 12/17/2010 8:12:56 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SeeSharp; SJSAMPLE

Aluminum isn’t new in fighter jets. The F-15 and F-18 both make fairly extensive use of aluminum, IIRC. My impression is that the material isn’t the issue here, it’s the grade and construction. The popular opinion at the time of the ATF competition was that the then YF-22 was selected because it was cheaper and had thrust vectoring, while the YF-23 was more expensive and didn’t have thrust vectoring at the time of the competition even though plans were on the table to add that particular capability. So the Air Force cheaped out on a plane that eventually was produced in very limited numbers, and now we get this story about corrosion—well, I’m not surprised.


38 posted on 12/18/2010 10:22:24 AM PST by Terpfen (Buh-bye, Suntan Charlie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson