Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pillut48

Actually, I thought the dress was a lot more attractive and appropriate than what she usually wears. I thought that it was appropriate in this economy to purchase from a thrift store until I saw the price tag, then I thought it was vintage Michelle.


13 posted on 12/17/2010 12:35:47 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: twigs

It’s a pretty dress, but I don’t think it really suits her, and once again, she needs to cover the arms (a light jacket or shawl would have done just fine) and I really, really hate it that they just do not make pantyhose to fit her!


30 posted on 12/17/2010 12:43:12 PM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: twigs

I thought the dress was lovely...but more suited for someone with an Audrey Hepburn physique.


31 posted on 12/17/2010 12:43:26 PM PST by Spudx7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: twigs

Norman Norell was a great designer. I think she looks great. Fabulous dress!


46 posted on 12/17/2010 12:56:14 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson