Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: 57 Percent View Palin Unfavorably
National Journal ^ | 12/14/10 | Jeremy P. Jacobs

Posted on 12/14/2010 5:25:20 PM PST by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Nachum

Going to kill them if she runs and wins.


21 posted on 12/14/2010 5:43:40 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Here is what the survey was comprised of. This is one huge bogus POS propaganda and anyone that has followed polling can see the bias built into this poll in spades!

LLS

Bloomberg News National Poll (Screams “we lie”)

SELZER & COMPANY Study #2004

1,000 U.S. adults ages 18 and over (Anyone that answered a phone)

December 4-7, 2010

Margin of Error: ± 3.1 percentage points (in your dreams)

*****Weighted by age and race***** (more sauce)

Responses were weighted by age and race to reflect the general population based on recent census data. (Uh huh... special sauce, lettuce and cheese)

Results based on smaller samples of respondents—such as by gender or age—have a larger margin of error. (even larger than the actual errors in this steaming pile of dung)

Republishing the copyrighted Bloomberg National Poll without credit to Bloomberg News is prohibited. (communists can be capitalists... who knew?)


22 posted on 12/14/2010 5:44:05 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Those would be great numbers from those people.


23 posted on 12/14/2010 5:45:39 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (Stimulus ~ Response / "...and that's why the color yellow makes me sad, I think.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

2010 election and the continuous defections to the republican side say yur full of it.


24 posted on 12/14/2010 5:46:54 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; Jim Robinson; ConjunctionJunction; Al B.; SolidWood; Leisler; greyfoxx39; ...
You are posting a RomneyBOT's BS against Gov. Palin.

GOP_Lady used to post this trash.


Jeremy P. Jacobs: ... said Eric Fehrnstrom, a spokesman for Romney.
“Fair-minded people look at Mitt Romney and see a strong leader,
a man of character and integrity who was elected as governor at a time of job loss
and recession and who managed
to balance the budget all four years without raising taxes and get the Massachusetts economy moving again."
[In fact, Romney brought Massachusetts to its knees]


" With vice presidential speculation in full swing, however, any appearances
by Romney during the Olympic broadcasts could raise his profile to the
Olympics’ wide national audience...."

25 posted on 12/14/2010 5:48:51 PM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

Click on the poll it shows the most important things wanted passed by the new congress is comprehensive immigration as wanted by over 70%. Hillary Clinton wanted by 64%. Then they have 63% want START passed are you kidding me. Who did they survey Harvard faculty ?


26 posted on 12/14/2010 5:49:19 PM PST by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

DummiecRATs keep teasing Grizzly Mama.
She will Reagan them out!
Go Saraaaaah!


27 posted on 12/14/2010 5:49:31 PM PST by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee-ssed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Wow! You believe the liberal media. LOL. Amazing.

Here's a hint: The media lies almost all of the time.

Where's your global warming, oil on the beaches from the damaged for decades beaches of the Bp oil “disaster”, swine flu, e coli etc.?

28 posted on 12/14/2010 5:51:34 PM PST by Democrat_media (Why is no government creating a product we can hold in our hands like a cell phone..?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

58% disapprove of Obama!


29 posted on 12/14/2010 5:51:34 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Must've polled in Detroit, Cleveland, Los Angeles, NYC, Newark, and Philly.

The Messiah was thought to be sent by God, in those areas.

30 posted on 12/14/2010 5:52:23 PM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Pelosi’s and Reid’s Democrat Congress has what a 7% approval?


31 posted on 12/14/2010 5:53:28 PM PST by Democrat_media (Why is no government creating a product we can hold in our hands like a cell phone..?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

They polled the Harvard faculty,Berkely faculty , East LA, and Harlem.


32 posted on 12/14/2010 5:56:03 PM PST by Democrat_media (Why is no government creating a product we can hold in our hands like a cell phone..?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: StormEye
. . . third party . . . .

Third party candidate really worked when Ross perot
ran, did't it? Gave us Clinton I, cigars and Clinton II.

No thanks.
33 posted on 12/14/2010 5:56:21 PM PST by righttackle44 (I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Have we all forgotten that Bloomberg is positioning himself as a third party "No Labels" progressive? He is going after the big artillery on both sides. Trust nothing Charlie Crists buddie has to say on the Palin subject.


34 posted on 12/14/2010 6:12:16 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

New Yorkers.


35 posted on 12/14/2010 6:17:33 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: righttackle44
"Third party candidate really worked when Ross perot ran, did't it? Gave us Clinton I, cigars and Clinton II."

Strangely enough, 3rd party candidates (those who manage to get at least 5% of the popular vote) have generally hurt the incumbent president, not helped them. The one exception in the last 80 years is Perot in 1996. Virtually every Perot vote was a vote that would have gone to Dole. Clinton still probably would have won, but it would have been MUCH closer.

I think a Bloomberg candidacy would REALLY help the Republican challenger, no matter who that challenger ends up being.

36 posted on 12/14/2010 6:29:31 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

You know, actually this is an improvement for her. Some of the polls immediately after her resignation were worse. 57 is a whole lot better than 67.


37 posted on 12/14/2010 6:31:36 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Notably, the Democratic Party (48 percent favorable, 33 percent unfavorable), the GOP (43 percent favorable, 48 percent unfavorable) and even the Tea Party (37 percent favorable, 41 percent unfavorable) all received higher marks than Palin.


They are more scared than even I thought.

This survey skews +15 to the dems and -5 to Republicans. Gov. Palin is 57% negative in a survey that only views Republicans as 43% positive. What that says is that everyone who views the Republicans as positive does not view Palin negatively.

These guys just saw a partial wave election (west coast not included). They fear a full wave election which will happen if Gov. Palin is the nominee.


38 posted on 12/14/2010 6:42:01 PM PST by excopconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I believe the numbers. I’ve never seen the media and the elites work harder to smear someone.


39 posted on 12/14/2010 6:46:40 PM PST by thecabal (Destroy Progressivism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Vs....

( Yeah, good luck salt/fat shorty twerp boy.)

40 posted on 12/14/2010 6:46:51 PM PST by Leisler (They always lie, and have for so much and for so long, that they no longer know what about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson